What method should I use to solve variable mass problems in physics?

AI Thread Summary
Variable mass problems in physics can be approached using two primary methods: the differential equation method and first principles. The differential equation method, represented by F=d(mv)/dt=mdv/dt+vdm/dt, is applicable in specific scenarios, such as when mass changes at a constant rate, as illustrated by the water droplet example. In contrast, first principles, which involve deriving changes in momentum to impulse, are universally applicable and can be used for all variable mass problems, including those like the rocket equation. Understanding when to apply each method hinges on the nature of the mass change; the first method is effective when mass changes predictably, while first principles provide a reliable fallback. Clarifying the conditions under which the differential method is valid can enhance comprehension of its application.
albega
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
I'm a little confused about these.

Sometimes I have seen solutions where F=d(mv)/dt=mdv/dt+vdm/dt is used and solved as a differential equation. An example is this:
A water drap falls through a cloud. It has initial mass m which increases at a constant rate km as it falls. Show that it's equation of motion is given by
kv+(1+kt)dv/dt=g(1+kt)
with v it's velocity and g the gravitational acceleration.

Sometimes however this does not seem to be applicable and we must work from first principles, equation a differential change in momentum dp to a differential impulse Fdt. An example is deriving the rocket equation, or a hot air balloon dropping sand.

My questions are:
How do I know which method to use?
Is the second method one that works for all cases whilst the first is just a special case?
If so when can I use the first method?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First principles always work. Use that.
 
dauto said:
First principles always work. Use that.

Ok but it would be nice to understand why the first method works in some cases if anybody could explain that...
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top