What methods are used to model/predict fission reactions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Topher925
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fission Reactions
AI Thread Summary
Quantum electrodynamics (QED) and quantum field theory (QFT) are not utilized in modeling fission reactions in nuclear reactors or weapons; instead, neutron diffusion and transport theory are employed. The probabilities of neutron reactions, known as cross-sections, are derived from experimental measurements, including neutron beam attenuation and resulting reactions. For nuclear reactors, microscopic cross-sections are converted into macroscopic cross-sections used in lattice codes like PHOENIX and CASMO, which help determine power levels and thermal power distribution during operation. Nuclear weapons require specialized codes for their unique physics, and Monte Carlo simulations are often used to model neutronic behavior, despite their computational intensity and statistical errors. All nuclear simulations rely on experimentally derived cross-sections, which are publicly accessible.
Topher925
Messages
1,562
Reaction score
7
This is a stupid question, but it has always been a question of mine that I have never been able to find a strait answer. To be more specific, is quantum electrodynamics or special relativity used to model or predict fission reactions such as those found in a nuclear explosion or inside a nuclear reactor? Do the classical laws of conservation of mass and energy still apply or only conservation of mass/energy?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In brief QFT/QED/QCD are not used in the prediction or modelling of fission reactions in reactors or weapons. Rather, special solutions of either neutron diffusion or transport theory are used.

The cross-sections (probabilities of a neutron reaction) are known from experiment. The cross sections are based on the attenuation measurements of neutron beams and the measurement of resulting reactions, which include scattering, absorption (with gamma emission), and absorption (with fission).

For nuclear fuel and reactors, the microscopic cross-sections are developed into macroscopic cross-sections which are used in so-called lattice codes, like PHOENIX or CASMO, or a proprietary code used by one of the reactor suppliers. The lattice codes then determined the relative power level of a cross-seciton of the fuel assembly as a function of burnup (exposure/depletion), and these results are used in core simulator to determine the fission rate and more particularly the thermal power distribution during operation of a reactor.

Most commercial fuel suppliers use a modified 2-group diffusion theory.

Nuclear weapons are quite different the commerical reactors, and they use very specialized codes the model the physics of those systems.
 
Thanks for the reply Astronuc. Very informative.
 
I could add that one uses also a lot Monte Carlo codes to simulate neutronic behaviour. They have the advantage of not having computer time to depend strongly on the complexity of the situation, and not needing many a priori assumptions about the behaviour of the solution. On the other hand, they have statistical errors, and they are CPU hogs.

But as Astro said, all nuclear happenings in all these codes are based upon experimentally derived cross sections. No nuclear theory is used in any of these codes. The experimental cross sections are freely available and can be found on the website of the NNDC for instance.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top