Studying What other books cover waves and vibrations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights two primary books on waves and vibrations: "Vibration and Waves in Physics" by Main, noted for its comprehensive table of contents, and "Vibrations and Waves" by French, which is criticized for its superficial treatment of wave packets and Fourier analysis. Participants are encouraged to share their experiences with Main's book and to explore additional resources. A free downloadable book by Benjamin Crowell is recommended, along with another by John Pain, emphasizing the essential knowledge of sound, mechanical, and electromagnetic waves, as well as the importance of partial differential equations in the study of these topics.
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I've run a search through amazon and I found that basically there are only 2 books about waves and vibrations:

1. 'Vibration and waves in physics' by Main, which looks good judging from the table of content

2. 'Vibrations and Waves' by French, which is the book I used for my W&V class but it doesn't treat the subject of wave packets and it introduces Fourier analysis only superficially.

Has anyone read 1. ?

What are the other books on waves and vibrations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is another one by John Pain. There is not much you need to know except sound (or mechanical waves) and electromagnetic waves.

PS: And of course partial differential equations.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Back
Top