What Potential Should Be Used for Energy Stored in a Charged Sphere?

Kosta1234
Messages
45
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Energy stored in a charged sphere
Relevant Equations
$$ U = \frac {1}{2} \cdot \int \phi (r) \cdot \rho(r) dV $$
Hi.
When I am asked to figure out the Energy stored in a charged sphere and I use this equation: ## U = \frac {1}{2} \cdot \int \phi (r) \cdot \rho(r) dV ##
what is the potential ## \phi ( r) ## stands for? I tried to use the potential inside the sphere, because out side of the sphere ## \rho (r) = 0 ##, and I tried to sum those to up.
I'm not getting the same answer as in this equation:
$$ U = \frac {\varepsilon }{2} \cdot \int_{all space} E^2 dV $$so what ## \phi (r) ## I've to use and why?Edit: I got it right, I think.
was I right when I said to use the potential inside the sphere, because out side of the sphere ## \rho (r) = 0 ##
and to use the ## U = \frac {\varepsilon }{2} \cdot \int_{all space} E^2 dV ## to all space?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the electrostatic potential you should use, i.e., the solution of the Legendre equation,
$$\Delta \phi(\vec{x})=-\frac{1}{\epsilon} \rho(\vec{x}).$$
This potential is defined up to a constant, and so is ##U##.

It's simple to show that (up to a constant) your two expressions deliver the same result. To see this, just use
$$\vec{E}=-\vec{\nabla} \phi$$
in one of the factors in the integral
$$\tilde{U}=\frac{\epsilon}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 x \vec{E}^2(\vec{x}),$$
and then Gauss's theorem for 3D partial integration! It's a good exercise!

BTW: You can fix the constant by demanding that ##U=0## for ##\rho=Q/V## (where ##Q## is the total charge, and ##V## the volume of the sphere; I guess you mean a homogeneously charged sphere).

You can also find the exact solution of this problem by solving the Legendre equation in shperical coordinates.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top