What probability density is used in Brownian motion?

Earthland
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a free Brownian particle and its coordinate is given as a function of time:

upload_2015-12-4_13-58-5.png


And its first moment, or mean, is given as

upload_2015-12-4_13-58-40.png


But what kind of probability density was used to calculate this first moment?

Homework Equations



I know that the first moment is calculated by using probability density

<x> = ∫x*W(x)dx from -infinity to +infinity.

X itself is dependent on t, so is it W(x) or W(x,t) or W(t)? I'm little lost on this one.

The Attempt at a Solution



I did find some kind of density function in regards to Brownian motion

upload_2015-12-4_14-6-0.png


But I can't see how this would yield the correct result. And still, must I integrate over x or t?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-12-4_13-57-39.png
    upload_2015-12-4_13-57-39.png
    18.2 KB · Views: 444
Physics news on Phys.org
Just take the expectation value of your first expression (expectation values are linear) keeping in mind that the only actually random variable in it is the driving force ##\zeta(t')##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top