What Shifts When Lenses Are Swapped in a Dual-Lens System?

AI Thread Summary
In a dual-lens system with a converging and diverging lens placed 5.0 cm apart, the object positioned at the focal length of the first lens leads to an undefined image position, indicating that the image is at infinity. This situation arises because the object is at the focal point of the converging lens, resulting in no converging effect. When the lenses are interchanged, the image from the first lens becomes the object for the second lens, which alters the final image position. The key concept here is understanding infinite conjugate, where the object at the focal length produces an image at infinity. To solve the problem, one must apply the thin lens equation appropriately for both lenses.
Physicsme
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Physics Homework Help Needed: Optics--Lens

Here's the physics problem that I need help:

A converging and diverging lens are placed 5.0 cm apart, and an object O is placed 5.0 cm from the first lens. Each lens has a 5.0 focal length. What happens to the image position if the lenses are interchanged?

Here's How I solved it:
My plan was to find the image of the object going through the first lens and then use that image as the object for the second lens. Interestingly, I kept getting the final image as 1/0, which is undefined? My first instinct was that there's something wrong with the problem!

So I went to a physics teacher for help. He said that when you have an object being at the position of the focal length, there's NO converging. He asked if my professor lectured on infinite conjugal. I said "no", I've never heard of it.

So in order to solve this problem, what do you do? Do you use limit? Do you neglect the image of the object going through the first lens and just use the object as it is going through the second lens?

I need help...I don't want the answer...I just want to know how you'd go through solving this problem...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi there,

Thank you for reaching out for help with your physics homework. I will do my best to guide you through the problem and help you understand the concepts involved.

First, let's review the basics of optics and lens. A converging lens has a positive focal length and can form real, inverted images. On the other hand, a diverging lens has a negative focal length and can only form virtual, upright images.

In the problem, we have two lenses, one converging and one diverging, placed 5.0 cm apart. The object is placed 5.0 cm from the first lens and both lenses have a focal length of 5.0 cm. This means that the object is at the focal point of the first lens, which is why you were getting 1/0 as the final image position.

To solve this problem, we need to understand the concept of infinite conjugate. This occurs when the object is placed at a distance equal to the focal length of a converging lens. In this case, the image formed by the lens will be at infinity. This is important because when we interchange the lenses, the object will now be at infinity, and we can use this as our starting point for the second lens.

So, to solve this problem, we will first find the image of the object formed by the first lens, which will be at infinity. Then, we will use this image as the object for the second lens and calculate the final image position.

To find the image formed by the first lens, we can use the thin lens equation: 1/f = 1/o + 1/i, where f is the focal length, o is the object distance, and i is the image distance. Since the object is at infinity, we can simplify the equation to 1/i = 1/f. Plugging in the values, we get i = f = 5.0 cm. This means that the image formed by the first lens will be at 5.0 cm from the lens, which is at infinity.

Now, for the second lens, we can use the same equation, but this time our object distance will be the image formed by the first lens, which is at 5.0 cm. Plugging in the values, we get 1/i' = 1/f + 1/o'. Since the object distance is now the image formed by the first lens, which is at infinity, we can
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top