What to do when language in a text gets rough

  • Thread starter Thread starter ice109
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Language Text
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of understanding a rigorous pure math textbook, particularly the difficulty in deciphering theorems and their conditions. The user expresses frustration with the book's complexity, which initially seemed appealing but has become overwhelming. Suggestions for improvement include exploring alternative texts that explain concepts more clearly, re-reading sections for better comprehension, attempting to complete proofs independently, and seeking help from a professor. A specific recommendation is made to consider "Arfken and Weber" for clearer language and explanations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of finding resources that balance rigor with clarity in mathematical learning.
ice109
Messages
1,707
Reaction score
6
specifically a pure math book? I'm reading this textbook and sometimes it takes me so long to figure out what the theorem or something is actually saying. I can't tell whether parts of it are supposed or are conditions or if they're using some characteristic of another proven part of the concept.

:cry:

it's so annoying cause for about 12 pages i really liked this book due to its rigor now its rigor is killing me.

its this one

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521664020/?tag=pfamazon01-20

if anyone knows a book like this, that's develops all the concepts from scratch, but is clearer I would very much like to know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can do a varity of things:

1) Pick up a new book on the subject and compare wording.
2) Re-read.
3) Attempt to complete the proof before the text gives it to you (this is a skill that you should start working on anyway, because many of the graduate math texts I have used tend to assume you can prove the almost every theorem they give you without too much insight).
4) Ask a professor to assist you are stumped.
 
in particular since it is a math book u should tend to be more intutive than looking for proofs in the book once u satisfy urdelf with an example then probably u will fell lot better.
 
You've chosen an old book to look into. Try Arfken and Weber. The words are more common.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...

Similar threads

Back
Top