What two measurements are made of an element using a mass

Thread starter BBboy
Start date Apr 12, 2006
Tags

Element Mass Measurements

AI Thread Summary

A mass spectrometer measures the mass-to-charge ratio of ions and the abundance of isotopes present in a sample. This allows for the identification of different isotopes of an element, which can provide insights into its composition and origin. By analyzing these measurements, scientists can determine the elemental makeup and isotopic ratios, aiding in various applications such as dating and tracing chemical processes. Understanding isotopes is crucial for accurately interpreting the data obtained from a mass spectrometer. Overall, mass spectrometry is a vital tool in elemental analysis and research.

Apr 12, 2006

BBboy

what two measurements are made of an element using a mass spectrometer?

Physics news on Phys.org

Apr 12, 2006

Astronuc

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

What do you think a mass spectrometer measures and how does that relate to an element?

Apr 18, 2006

gem0688

A MASS spectrometer measures the M_ _ _. From knowing that you might be able to work out what the element is you are looking at. what do you think?

Apr 18, 2006

Astronuc

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Hint: Isotopes.

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

View full post »