Programs What undergraduate course should i major in if i want to be a .

AI Thread Summary
For aspiring nanotechnology and material science researchers, selecting the right undergraduate major is crucial. Programs specifically dedicated to nanotechnology or material science are recommended, with notable institutions like MIT, Rice, and Purdue highlighted for their strong offerings. Canadian students may consider the University of Waterloo's nanotechnology engineering program as a reference for core courses. A solid foundation in physics and chemistry is essential, as these subjects underpin nanoscience. Pursuing a major in physics or materials science, potentially with a minor in chemistry, is advised, followed by graduate studies in nanoscience or materials engineering to excel in the field. Understanding the basics and building upon them through advanced education is emphasized as key to success in nanotechnology research.
Unknown_9999
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
what undergraduate course should i major in if i want to be a ...

nanotechnology/material science researcher?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Unknown_9999 said:
nanotechnology/material science researcher?

well there are schools that offer undergrads in nanotech and material science...
 


maverick_starstrider said:
well there are schools that offer undergrads in nanotech and material science...

which is the best one?rice?mit?or purdue??how about schools in china? should i learn physics too?what are some maths that will benefit me?what are the other things that could help me excel in this field?
 


Unknown_9999 said:
which is the best one?rice?mit?or purdue??how about schools in china? should i learn physics too?what are some maths that will benefit me?what are the other things that could help me excel in this field?

I don't really know which american schools (I'm Canadian) but if you go into a program that is dedicated to either nanotech or material science you'll just take the courses you're supposed to (and they'll probably outline extra courses you might want to take). As a reference here's the core course outline for nanotechnology engineering at Waterloo http://www.nanotech.uwaterloo.ca/Undergraduate_Studies/Course_List/?show=core
 


maverick_starstrider said:
I don't really know which american schools (I'm Canadian) but if you go into a program that is dedicated to either nanotech or material science you'll just take the courses you're supposed to (and they'll probably outline extra courses you might want to take). As a reference here's the core course outline for nanotechnology engineering at Waterloo http://www.nanotech.uwaterloo.ca/Undergraduate_Studies/Course_List/?show=core

i know about that,but isn't mit the leading school in nano industry?what kind of requirements do i need to do well in nano field?are there any other courses that has potential to revolutionrize the world too?
 


If it were me, I'd like to major in physics and chemistry to make sure I understand the basics of nanoscience which I think begins in chemistry and physics. Then I would go to grad school for nanoscience or materials engineering. Or I would major in materials science and minor in chemistry and of course go to grad school. If I were going to be a researcher I'd make sure I understood all the basics and build from that by going to grad school.
 

Thread 'Applied Math PhD candidate but I hate group theory'

TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
View full post »

Thread 'Where did all the “fundamentals-deepening” master’s programs go?'

I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
View full post »

Similar threads

Any tips for doing a PhD in theoretical physics?
Replies
21
Views
3K
Other How can I fill course requirements for Physics Master's program?
Replies
4
Views
815
Courses Choosing courses for mathematics minor to support my physics major
Replies
6
Views
2K
Admissions I Need some advice about my physics undergraduate options
Replies
11
Views
2K
Undergraduate ABET and MS non-ABET
Replies
14
Views
3K
Courses Should I take advanced courses as a physics undergraduate?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Studying Seeking your suggestions on my upcoming undergraduate course workload
Replies
5
Views
2K
Programs How many concentration courses in an undergraduate degree
Replies
4
Views
1K
Course advice for Theoretical Physics at Cambridge University
Replies
2
Views
2K
Programs Dual Major Undergraduate program vs. Extra year
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top