What values of k make the proportion of observations with |di| ≥ k meaningful?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mark53
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stats
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the values of k that ensure the proportion of observations with |di| ≥ k remains meaningful. It is established that the proportion cannot exceed 1/(k^2) based on the inequality r ≥ (n-1)/(k^2). The participants explore the implications of k being equal to zero, concluding that k must not equal zero for the analysis to hold. There is a call for clarification on the variables r, n, k, and di to enhance understanding. Overall, defining these variables is crucial for determining the meaningful values of k.
Mark53
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given that r≥(n-1)/(k^2)

a) Show that the proportion of observations for which |di | ≥ k cannot exceed 1/(k^2)

b) For what values of k is this meaningful.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
a)

(r/n)≥(n-1)/(n*k^2)

(r/n)≥(n-1)/(n*k^2)

(r/n)≥(n)/(n*k^2) -1/(n*k^2)

1/(n*k^2)+(r/n) ≥ 1/(k^2)

Is this the correct way to solve it?

b)

would k only be meaningful if it does not =0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are r,n,k,di?

It is clearly not meaningful for k=0, yes. For other values, it would help to have the variables defined.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top