What variables affect the amplitude and equilibrium of waves and springs?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between kinetic energy (KE), potential energy (PE), and the variables affecting amplitude and equilibrium in waves and springs. At equilibrium, the displacement (Δx) is zero, resulting in maximum kinetic energy and zero force exerted by the spring. Conversely, at maximum amplitude, Δx is greatest, leading to maximum potential energy, with force and acceleration also at their peaks. Velocity reaches its maximum at equilibrium when KE is highest, while force and acceleration are maximized at amplitude when PE is highest. Understanding these relationships clarifies the dynamics of waves and springs.
Scholar1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
What variables are maximum at amplitude and equilibrium? What variables are minimum at amplitude and equilibrium? I'm confused about this topic... I know KE is max at equilibrium and PE is max at amplitude.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should state your question better. I don't know what you're asking.

At equilibrium Δx = 0 and at max amplitude Δx is greatest. The force the spring exerts at equilibrium is zero, and is max at amplitude. K never changes.
 
Sorry I mean like velocity, acceleration, and force. @Karmaslap
 
Velocity is max when KE is maxed. Force and Acceleration are both max when the PE is max. You should have known when force and velocity were maxed if you know what KE and PE are.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top