What Velocity is Needed for a Rocket Pilot to Reach a Star in One Year?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bunnyrabid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rocket Star Year
AI Thread Summary
To determine the velocity required for a rocket pilot to reach a star 4 light years away in one year of the pilot's time, relativistic effects must be considered. The Lorentz factor plays a crucial role in relating the proper time and distance from the pilot's perspective to the stationary observer on Earth. The discussion highlights confusion regarding a specific step in the provided solution, particularly the transition from lines 6 to 7. A substitution from relevant formulas in special relativity is suggested, but the user is uncertain about the correct application. Clarification on these calculations is sought to better understand the problem.
bunnyrabid
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The pilot of a rocket wants to reach a star in 1 year. The rocket is currently on Earth. The star is 4 light years away, measured from an observer on Earth. What velocity is needed for the pilot to reach the star in a year in the pilot's/rocket's time?

Homework Equations



See below. Relativistic Length = Proper Length / Lorentz factor is used below, to make the substitution from Line 2 to Line 3 of L to L'/(Lorentz factor). The gamma symbol indicates the Lorentz factor.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have been given a solution, I just don't understand it. Is someone able to explain the jump from lines 6 to 7 in this solution? http://i.imgur.com/F70Oy.jpg . T' and L' indicate the proper time (time is from pilot's perspective, hence 1 year, distance from Earth's perspective, hence 4 light years). Tp is used the in first line, it is the same as T', hence where the T' comes from in Line 4.

I have been struggling with this for some time. Any help is appreciated, thank you!

Edit: I believe there is a substitution of a formula from this section of Wikipedia but I am unsure which one. Also, Wikipedia uses different symbols (in each formula, variables without a dash indicate measurements made in the stationary reference frame, unlike mine). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity#Time_dilation_and_length_contraction
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Why not just do it yourself? I'll get you started

t'=d'/v
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top