What voltage appears across the primary coil of this transormer

  • Thread starter Thread starter carrieunder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coil Voltage
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the voltage across the primary coil of a step-down transformer when 120 V is applied to the secondary coil. Initially, the user attempts to use the transformer ratio incorrectly by adding voltages instead of applying the correct ratio method. The correct ratio derived from the transformer’s operation indicates that if the secondary voltage is 120 V, the primary voltage should be calculated as 120 V multiplied by the ratio of 20, resulting in 2400 V. The participants clarify the misunderstanding, emphasizing that the relationship between primary and secondary voltages is based solely on their ratio, not addition. Ultimately, the correct voltage across the primary coil is confirmed to be 2400 V.
carrieunder
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A step down transformer produces a voltage of 6.0 V across the secondary coil when the voltage across the primary coil is 120 V. What voltage appears across the primary coil of this transormer if 120 V is applied to the secondary coil?


Homework Equations



Vp/Vs=Np/Ns=Is/Ip .... ? (not sure if that is relevant really)

The Attempt at a Solution



i know Vs/Vp = 120/6

i think i don't really know what to do with the 120 v applied to the secondary coil
i added 120 to the 6 = 126 that means 6 was multiplied by a factor of 21
so i multiplied the top value of the ratio (120) by 21 and got 2520 v
but I am really not sure if that's right at all? what does "120 V is applied" in mathematical terms?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got everything so right, I'm not sure how you can go wrong. Vs/Vp=120/6=20. So if Vp=6V, Vs=20*Vp=120V. Now suppose Vs=120V? Where is the 21 factor coming from? You don't add the secondary to the primary, it's just a ratio.
 
Last edited:
ok i get it i made a stupid mistake
so its really 120 X 20 right?
so the answer is 2400 ?
 
carrieunder said:
ok i get it i made a stupid mistake
so its really 120 X 20 right?
so the answer is 2400 ?

Yes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top