What was the initial polarization direction of the incident light?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the initial polarization direction of incident light when it passes through two polarizers oriented at 40 degrees to each other, resulting in only 15% of the light transmitting through. The application of Malus's Law is suggested as the method to solve the problem. After calculations, the initial polarization angle is found to be approximately 59.6 degrees. Participants engage with the problem-solving process, confirming the approach and solution. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding polarizer interactions in optics.
xQuin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two polarizers are oriented at 40deg to each other and plane-polarized light is incident on them. If only 15% of the light gets through both of them, what twas the initial polarization directon of the incident light?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I think it ha something to do with Malus's Law but I'm not sure exactly how
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi xQuin! welcome to pf! :wink:

yes, assume that the angle of polarization to the first polarizer is θ …

how much goes through the first polarizer, and how much of that goes through the second?

show us what you get :smile:​
 
Thanks tim, I applied the law twice and managed to get an answer of 59.6deg =D
 
looks good! :smile:
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Polarization of Light: Polarizer
Replies
7
Views
2K
Effect of a polarizer/analyzer on partially polarized light
Replies
25
Views
3K
Things to talk about in a Polarization Write-up
Replies
1
Views
2K
Intensity of light passing through 3 polarizers
Replies
3
Views
6K
Elliptically polarized light incident at Brewster's angle
Replies
1
Views
1K
What is the minimum number of Polarizers needed
Replies
3
Views
3K
The intentsity out of two polarizers
Replies
5
Views
2K
How can light be partially polarized?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Vertically polarized light from a hene laser passes through a linear
Replies
6
Views
2K
Discover the Effects of Rotating Polarizing Films | Explained with Examples
Replies
10
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top