What Was the Initial Speed of the Second Stone to Hit the Water Simultaneously?

AI Thread Summary
A stone is dropped from a bridge 50 meters high, and a second stone is thrown down one second later, both hitting the water simultaneously. The first stone falls under constant acceleration due to gravity, allowing the calculation of the time it takes to reach the water. This time can then be used to determine the initial speed required for the second stone to ensure both stones strike the water at the same time. The relevant kinematic equation, s = ut + 1/2 at², is suggested for solving the problem. Understanding and memorizing kinematic equations is crucial for solving similar physics problems effectively.
sillybilly
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A stone is dropped off a bridge 50m above the water. Exactly 1s later another stone is thrown down and both stones strike the water together. What must the initial speed of the second stone have been?

ohh I am sorry but i have no idea please help me out here
thank you soooo much :)

Homework Equations


conservation law?


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
someone please please help me :(
 
Try gathering the given data and forming the relevant equations.

Here, the first stone is 'dropped', and not thrown. Hence, it must be falling down with constant acceleration 'g'. Since you know the height, you can find the time required for the stone to touch the surface of the water.

Now knowing the time, you can easily find the velocity with which the next stone must be thrown, since the time interval is also given.

Try this out, and tell us where you get stuck.
 
All you need to use is s = ut + \frac{1}{2} a{t}^{2}

The only difference between the two cases is with u and t.
Try it out. It's pretty simple
 
can you please tell me how you got that equation? with that equation it is simple but how did you get it?
 
sillybilly said:
can you please tell me how you got that equation? with that equation it is simple but how did you get it?

Here is a link showing a derivation, that is non-calculus based:
http://tinyurl.com/2bmdasu

The equation is part of a list of equations for "kinematics" equations for constant acceleration. I suggest memorizing each these equations. If you are taking a non-calculus based physics class, your particular coursework/textbook might introduce these equations in a slightly different format from the link above (but they are usually still given to you). Memorize the equations in the format given in your text and coursework (that way, when you use them on homework or a test, there won't be any ambiguity about where you got them).

If you are taking a calculus based class, the formulas come from the direct result of knowing that (and integrating),

\vec {v(t)} = \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \vec {s(t)} \ \

\vec {a(t)} = \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \vec {v(t)} \ \
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top