What Would Happen to a Shattered Earth-Like Planet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planet
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of an Earth-like planet being shattered into large pieces, exploring the implications of such an event on the structure and fate of the resulting shards. Participants consider various destructive forces that could lead to this outcome and speculate on the characteristics of the fragments and their environments over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the nature of the destructive force will influence the form of the shards, questioning how much destruction is necessary to separate a planet into pieces that do not recombine.
  • Another participant speculates that asteroids could be remnants of similar catastrophic events, although this is not directly applicable to the scenario being discussed.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that existing asteroids have been shaped by collisions and self-collapse, leading to near-spherical forms, which may not align with the desired outcome of irregularly shaped fragments.
  • One participant proposes a specific mechanism involving an antimatter explosion at the equator to create two large pieces, suggesting that this could result in molten hemispheres and a distinct trajectory for the moon.
  • Another participant argues that large pieces would likely collapse under their own gravity into spherical shapes, implying that only smaller fragments could retain irregular forms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the outcomes of the shattering event, particularly regarding the shapes and stability of the resulting pieces. There is no consensus on the mechanisms or characteristics of the fragments, indicating multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about the physical properties of the planet's material, the nature of the explosive force, and the gravitational effects on the fragments are not fully resolved, leaving open questions regarding the feasibility of the proposed scenarios.

DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
24,445
Reaction score
8,681
There's a short story rattling around in my head. The premise involves an Earth-like planet that has been shattered (not reduced to rubble, but cracked into large pieces).

It is an artificial catastrophe, to be sure, but exactly what form of weapon or other destructive force was used is open to imagination (you are welcome to posit causes that will lead to the effect I'm looking for, but it is not important).

What I'm interested in is what form the shards would take. (this would likely be dependent on the nature of the destructive force). I'm looking for the least destruction required to separate a planet into two or more pieces that do not immediately recombine.

What might I expect the planetary environs to be, say, a century or so after the rending asunder. Obviously, after rounding the sun a hundred times, some of it will be quite spread out into, not a full ring, but an arc.

My primary question is about how the largest pieces might fare. The Earth is mostly high-viscosity liquid, so the largest pieces couldn't be more than - what? - a hundred miles thick? If that's true, is it safe to assume that no single piece could possibly measure more than a couple of hundred miles across? Any broader and they would simply collapse in on themselves by their own gravity like an eggshell in a closed fist.

Input?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's still speculated, the last I heard, that the asteroids are remnants of such an occurrence. Maybe you can start there and work around it a bit.
 
Well, all our asteroids are ancient and have been reduced by collisions and self-collapse to near spheroids. So not what I'm after.
 
DaveC426913 said:
two or more pieces

DaveC426913 said:
more than - what?
Take a sp. gr. of ~ 3 for crustal material (the rest ain't going to be too terribly interesting), a crushing strength of 5-10 kpsi (70 MPa?), Fgfrag ~ 3000d3Gmtest/r2 = 1.6 x 10-6N x r, where r = d/2 is a "mean" radius for the fragment --- solve for a mean diameter or radius that exceeds crush strength for whatever geographic relief is necessary for the story.
 
I think the best approach would be to allow an antimatter rope (or other suitable explosive) to descend onto the equator - so that a toroidal explosion squeezes the Earth into two pieces. If the detonation was little more than minimal and occurred during an equinox, there would be two large pieces in solar orbits that would keep them apart for years.

Aside from the north and south hemispheres that would each form a molten planet, there would be "splash" from the equatorial section that was most directly squeezed.

The moon would head off in its own direction.
 
Large pieces would collapse under their own weight into a sphere. Only small asteroid sized pieces could have weird shapes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
774
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K