News What would probably be the most impactful steps to stop seal bashing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jurrasic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Seal
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the seal hunt, with participants debating its sustainability and the ethical implications of seal bashing. Some argue that the seal population has increased significantly, making the hunt less concerning, while others highlight the economic necessity for local communities. There is a call for more awareness and creative ideas to address seal bashing, but some participants feel that the focus on seals overshadows more severe wildlife issues, like illegal hunts elsewhere. The conversation also touches on the perception of seals as "cute" animals, which influences public sentiment and activism. Ultimately, the thread seeks impactful strategies to raise awareness about seal bashing while navigating the complexities of wildlife conservation and local livelihoods.
Jurrasic
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Ideas?

So far, I have thought of making a club at my school to create awareness and to encourage people to take some kind of action to stop it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure if this is the area to discuss this but I never even felt that 'stopping seal bashing' was all that important.

Firstly: The seal hunt is MORE than likely sustainable... even if it isn't however numbers of seals have gone up SIGNIFICANTLY in the last 30 years.

Secondly: It's someones way of making income for their family etc. Seals are not endangered (far from) so why the big stink? Maybe if they were hunting tigers something to that effect but their not.

Thirdly: I actually think that a bigger stink is made about the seal hunt than is about illegal hunts occurring in various parts of the world... look at the dolphin trade in Japan. I think this is due to the fact that there is a lot of money to be made by animal rights groups over the cute seals.

Maybe one could argue that the killing methods are inhumane... I'm pretty sure that the Canadian Vetrenarian Association did a study and found that the killings caused minimal suffering to the animal. Hmph.
 
I think it's a great idea. You could name the club: "Club Seals." Or perhaps, "Club Baby Seals" would be even more appropriate. That's bound to raise awareness.
 
Bumper stickers to promote awareness:

seal.jpg
 
Seriously though.

Sorry! said:
Maybe one could argue that the killing methods are inhumane...
We should verify that this is what the OP is asking about - whether he is objecting to seal hunting or just seal clubbing.
 
Sorry! said:
I'm not sure if this is the area to discuss this but I never even felt that 'stopping seal bashing' was all that important.

Firstly: The seal hunt is MORE than likely sustainable... even if it isn't however numbers of seals have gone up SIGNIFICANTLY in the last 30 years.

Secondly: It's someones way of making income for their family etc. Seals are not endangered (far from) so why the big stink? Maybe if they were hunting tigers something to that effect but their not.

Thirdly: I actually think that a bigger stink is made about the seal hunt than is about illegal hunts occurring in various parts of the world... look at the dolphin trade in Japan. I think this is due to the fact that there is a lot of money to be made by animal rights groups over the cute seals.

Maybe one could argue that the killing methods are inhumane... I'm pretty sure that the Canadian Vetrenarian Association did a study and found that the killings caused minimal suffering to the animal. Hmph.

OK No, the thread is NOT to discuss whether or not it is important to stop seal bashing but to discuss impactful ways to stop the seal bashing , it would after all take some really creative and good ideas to accomplish this most likely. Your post is not on the correct thread, Have you tried starting your own thread asking others whether or not it is important because , as said, this thread is not about what you are off in a corner discussing amongst yourself, totally different topic.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Seriously though.


We should verify that this is what the OP is asking about - whether he is objecting to seal hunting or just seal clubbing.

The seal bashing is beyond sad, detail by detail becomes more sad, the hunting is bad also but not as unnecessary and painful as 'seal bashing' which is a systematic for profit thing , hunting is some what part of the eco system but sad also, seal bashing is just horrid though.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Bumper stickers to promote awareness:

seal.jpg

No no no, that doesn't look pro seal, in fact it looks anti seal :( Is it anti seal or are you sticking up for the seals. shoot.
 
Mark24 said:
I think it's a great idea. You could name the club: "Club Seals." Or perhaps, "Club Baby Seals" would be even more appropriate. That's bound to raise awareness.

Need more ideas , many many more ideas , the more the better :)
 
  • #10
Sorry! said:
I'm not sure if this is the area to discuss this but I never even felt that 'stopping seal bashing' was all that important.

Firstly: The seal hunt is MORE than likely sustainable... even if it isn't however numbers of seals have gone up SIGNIFICANTLY in the last 30 years.

Secondly: It's someones way of making income for their family etc. Seals are not endangered (far from) so why the big stink? Maybe if they were hunting tigers something to that effect but their not.

Thirdly: I actually think that a bigger stink is made about the seal hunt than is about illegal hunts occurring in various parts of the world... look at the dolphin trade in Japan. I think this is due to the fact that there is a lot of money to be made by animal rights groups over the cute seals.

Maybe one could argue that the killing methods are inhumane... I'm pretty sure that the Canadian Vetrenarian Association did a study and found that the killings caused minimal suffering to the animal. Hmph.

What if there was a human bashing and some seal was on a forum saying " I really don't think stopping human bashing is all that important." What if the human being skinned alive and bashed was YOU. Very curious what your answer might be, tell me. But you'll come up with some thing totally annoying as an answerand totally antagonistic and anti seal or apathetic still, correct?
 
  • #11
Jurrasic said:
OK No, the thread is NOT to discuss whether or not it is important to stop seal bashing but to discuss impactful ways to stop the seal bashing
Shouldn;t you first determine if it should be stopped? That is by no means a foregone conclusion.


Jurrasic said:
Mark24 said:
I think it's a great idea. You could name the club: "Club Seals." Or perhaps, "Club Baby Seals" would be even more appropriate. That's bound to raise awareness.
Need more ideas , many many more ideas , the more the better :)
You should be aware that he is teasing you. Naming your club "Club Baby Seals" would be alarmingly counterproductive.




Jurrasic said:
DaveC426913 said:
Bumper stickers to promote awareness:

seal.jpg
No no no, that doesn't look pro seal, in fact it looks anti seal :( Is it anti seal or are you sticking up for the seals. shoot.
You do realize that I am teasing you too.

Jurrasic said:
What if there was a human bashing and some seal was on a forum saying " I really don't think stopping human bashing is all that important." What if the human being skinned alive and bashed was YOU. Very curious what your answer might be, tell me.
I guess you are a strict vegetarian then? If not, you are killing to sustain yourself.
 
  • #12
Jurrasic said:
OK No, the thread is NOT to discuss whether or not it is important to stop seal bashing but to discuss impactful ways to stop the seal bashing , it would after all take some really creative and good ideas to accomplish this most likely. Your post is not on the correct thread, Have you tried starting your own thread asking others whether or not it is important because , as said, this thread is not about what you are off in a corner discussing amongst yourself, totally different topic.

This is a Science forum. If you want to discuss a Political campaign to protect seals, then it probably should be done somewhere else.
 
  • #13
joelupchurch said:
This is a Science forum. If you want to discuss a Political campaign to protect seals, then it probably should be done somewhere else.

Oh I don't know about that. Maybe it belongs in a different sub-forum, but the OP has come here for ideas. We support that.

Though he may not get quite the responses he wants.
 
  • #14
joelupchurch said:
This is a Science forum. If you want to discuss a Political campaign to protect seals, then it probably should be done somewhere else.

FYI, the Mentors are discussing a move to P&WA or GD or leaving it here. It's late, though, so there probably won't be a consensus until morning.
 
  • #15
I am completely against the killing of animals for their fur, which is the primary reason the seals are killed. The seal hunt is sanctioned by the Canadian government. Although the clubbing of seals under 12-14 days of age is now illegal, any baby seal over that age can be clubbed to death.

This is a pro-seal clubbing article, it states the Canadian government's reasons for endorsing the hunts as an economic stimulous.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/05/05/f-seal-hunt.html

We have already caused the extinction of one seal species from over hunting. Even though there currently are large numbers of seals, natural disasters can quickly decimate a species

Caribbean Monk Seal Gone Extinct From Human Causes, NOAA Confirms

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080608074828.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
I think that people should instead of condemning Canada or the hunters do more research into the hunt. Do more research into the Native Newfoundlanders, the Newfondlanders and the Inuit peoples. Do research into the cod fishing industry (it's ironic how overfishing destroyed that and the Canadian government shut that down yet other countries are still fishing for cod) yet the flak comes back at the Canadians when they are doing a more than likely sustainable hunt.

It's easy for you to sit here and cry about killing the 'poor cute little seal' from your more than likely nice home and great job. Are you going to lend these people $10000 when the seal hunt is done every year? Especially the Inuit, they'll need it the most. Which is OUR fault by the way too, if you care to look it up.
 
  • #17
Sorry! said:
I think that people should instead of condemning Canada or the hunters do more research into the hunt. Do more research into the Native Newfoundlanders, the Newfondlanders and the Inuit peoples. Do research into the cod fishing industry (it's ironic how overfishing destroyed that and the Canadian government shut that down yet other countries are still fishing for cod) yet the flak comes back at the Canadians when they are doing a more than likely sustainable hunt.

It's easy for you to sit here and cry about killing the 'poor cute little seal' from your more than likely nice home and great job. Are you going to lend these people $10000 when the seal hunt is done every year? Especially the Inuit, they'll need it the most. Which is OUR fault by the way too, if you care to look it up.
A lot of that is covered in the article I posted. I chose it over articles by groups that oppose the hunts because, even though the the CBC article presents the pro-clubbing viewpoint, it seems to me to be a fair representation of the situation. I abhore alarmism. It's a sad state of affairs that killing primarily for fur has to be considered necessary for income. There is no easy solution.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Evo said:
It's a sad state of affairs that killing primarily for fur has to be considered necessary for income.
Probably better than drilling for oil being necessary for income.
The trouble is that seals are cute - chickens, cod and king crab aren't

The only way to stop it, other than fitting the seals with laser beams is to remove the demand.
There isn't much demand for fur coats from anybody under 50 in the US/Europe so the only new market is likely to be China. If you stop fur seal they will just get Panda coats instead.

Europe tried trade sanctions, but since the only Canadian export to europe is mapple syrup this isn't really biting. The US could boycott Canadian oil ?
 
  • #19
How about a bumper sticker that says I (heart symbol) baby seals, don't (club symbol) them.
 
  • #20
Pricey, but maybe raise funds and buy the land the seals live? Animal-rights interests could spend their donations in better areas, then.
 
  • #21
Instead of clubbing them they could use a pneumatic punch. I believe they use them in slaughter houses. Like on that movie, "No Country for Old Men". They wouldn't feel a thing.
 
  • #22
jimmysnyder said:
How about a bumper sticker that says I (heart symbol) baby seals, don't (club symbol) them.
Below the arctic circle so what? It would be lost among the stop-logging, stop-drilling, stop-vanoc, stop-starbucks, etc bumber stickers.
Above the arctic circle, about as useful as driving around Houston with a stop drilling in Alaska bumber sticker.
 
  • #23
I am completely against the killing of animals for their fur, ...

UNLESS ? ...

Eat what you kill, Use what you kill.
I am against waist and non-sustainable harvest.
As in, I am against fashion over food.
 
  • #24
Alfi said:
I am completely against the killing of animals for their fur, ...

UNLESS ? ...

Eat what you kill, Use what you kill.
I am against waist and non-sustainable harvest.
As in, I am against fashion over food.

You are against hunting? The Dept of Fish & Game allows controls hunting in order to thin out the population of different species. They banned hunting in the UK and now they have a roadkill problem, for example. I believe it's the deer or similar game that is causing automobile crashes all over countryside.

Coyotes, shall we let them breed like bunnies and run the streets?

Controlled killing of animals is necessary otherwise you end up causing dangerous circumstances to where humans end up getting killed.
 
  • #25
Clubbing an animal to death is inhumane and should be stopped. Clubbing a juevenile animal is even worse.

Would you take your dog into be 'put to sleep', if you knew that the method used was clubbing?

They club the animals because the animals aren't able to defend themselves. It is inhumane. Hunting is one thing. Brutally killing an animal, when there are more humane options, is not.

This brutal practice should be stopped.

As for what you can do, raising money for organizations fighting this practice is the most effective use of your time, probably. 'Raising awareness' does nothing. Money does.
 
  • #26
DaveC426913 said:
Shouldn;t you first determine if it should be stopped? That is by no means a foregone conclusion.
You should be aware that he is teasing you. Naming your club "Club Baby Seals" would be alarmingly counterproductive.You do realize that I am teasing you too.

I guess you are a strict vegetarian then? If not, you are killing to sustain yourself.

vegetarian yes, there is no such thing as a strict vegetarian, either your either vegetarian or your not.
 
  • #27
drankin said:
You are against hunting? The Dept of Fish & Game allows controls hunting in order to thin out the population of different species. They banned hunting in the UK and now they have a roadkill problem, for example. I believe it's the deer or similar game that is causing automobile crashes all over countryside.

Spot on. Natural predators of animals like deer once helped to keep populations in check, but they have disappeared. If deer, for example, are not thinned out, there will be consequences. Automobile accidents would skyrocket like you mentioned. The american deer tick, responsible for infecting humans with a number of illnesses such as Lyme disease, largely depends on the deer population for reproduction as well since deer are the primary hosts of the ticks.
 
  • #28
Jurrasic said:
vegetarian yes, there is no such thing as a strict vegetarian, either your either vegetarian or your not.
There are many flavours of vegetarian. (for example, some avoid any animal products, including milk and eggs).
 
  • #29
It's easy for you to sit here and cry about killing the 'poor cute little seal' from your more than likely nice home and great job. Are you going to lend these people $10000 when the seal hunt is done every year?
We already do, with no market for fur coats and the EU ban on imports the Canadian government has to subsidize the hunt most years. Add in the damage to other Canadian exports from the publicity and other bans and I'm already paying people money to hunt.
 
  • #30
mgb_phys said:
We already do, with no market for fur coats and the EU ban on imports the Canadian government has to subsidize the hunt most years. Add in the damage to other Canadian exports from the publicity and other bans and I'm already paying people money to hunt.

So this has been going on for 'most years'... interesting I thought the EU decided to ban SEAL imports just last September. Since the hunt takes place pretty much just for the month of April we haven't even gone through a period where the hunt has taken place with the EU ban on seal imports.

The ban on seal imports doesn't include native imports. As well EU is a pretty small market for the imports, the problem with this ban however is that it will still drive prices down for the imports.

EDIT: Oh yeah, just one other thing on the bans, the regulations don't go into effect until August, and they are still being negotiated. If you some how think that because of all this you are somehow paying these people to live you are very mistaken. Go up to Nunavut and tell me how their living conditions are, go up there after the ban and tell me if their the same because now you're still 'paying them to hunt'.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #31
While I understand your sentiment, I think your stance is more emotional than rational. The arguments you put forth are weak.

One premise that is essential for we as humans to acknowledge: we can no longer separate ourselves from "nature". We have no choice but to steward our planet and all its natural resources. Any other stance is naive and tantamount to putting ones head in the sand.


dotman said:
Clubbing an animal to death is inhumane and should be stopped. Clubbing a juevenile animal is even worse.
Why is clubbing a juvenile any worse?

dotman said:
Would you take your dog into be 'put to sleep', if you knew that the method used was clubbing?
Faulty analogy. We adopt dogs for their companionship and we don't choose to put them to sleep unelss they are suffering. We hunt seals. The premise of hunting is that the critters are going to die.

dotman said:
They club the animals because the animals aren't able to defend themselves. It is inhumane. Hunting is one thing.
By hunting I assume you mean with rifles? Are animals better able to defend themselves against rifles at a hundred yards than a club at point-blank?


dotman said:
'Raising awareness' does nothing. Money does.
Have you not thought this through? You do not see a correlation between raising awareness and raising money?

I guess about a hundred thousand special interest initiatives and charities have it totally wrong...
 
  • #32
Sorry! said:
Go up to Nunavut and tell me how their living conditions are, go up there after the ban and tell me if their the same because now you're still 'paying them to hunt'.
Most of the hunting isn't by inuit it's by newfies.
I couldn't care less about the seals, I do care about paying people to hunt seals and then destroying the crop to keep prices up or because there isn't a market - just so keep a few local MPs on side to prop up the government.
I care even more if the EU uses this as an excuse to block/tariff Canadian software/aerospace.

All countries end up doing this - the Eu subsidizes tobacco with one hand and pays for anti smoking campaigns with the other. But subsidizing something that screws your countries image is just as crazy.
 
  • #33
DaveC426913 said:
We have no choice but to steward our planet and all its natural resources. Any other stance is naive and tantamount to putting ones head in the sand.

I'm sure this is exactly how seal-clubbers see themselves; as stewards of nature. And I'm certain they're doing it to take care of our natural resources. Not for, oh, I don't know... the money.

DaveC426913 said:
Why is clubbing a juvenile any worse?

Cut me a break. Go ask any five year old.

DaveC426913 said:
Faulty analogy. We adopt dogs for their companionship and we don't choose to put them to sleep unelss they are suffering.

It wasn't an analogy. It was a question. Would you take your dog into be put to sleep, if you knew the method used was clubbing? Go ahead and answer that question, and then feel free to try and argue its validity or not. But answer it first.

DaveC426913 said:
By hunting I assume you mean with rifles? Are animals better able to defend themselves against rifles at a hundred yards than a club at point-blank?

Clubbing is brutal.

DaveC426913 said:
Have you not thought this through? You do not see a correlation between raising awareness and raising money?

I don't pay my bills with awareness. Do you? Come on, at this point, its almost like you're going out of your way to argue with me here.

Like you said, there are a million causes vying for attention. Awareness is great. Money is better.
 
  • #34
dotman said:
Clubbing is brutal.

Maybe you believe it would be more humane to gather them up and take them to a gas chamber? Clubbing would be more humane than slitting their throats, I would think. Like I was saying, a pneumatic punch in the forehead would be quick, certain, and painless.

Do you have a better idea on how to efficiently kill them?
 
  • #35
dotman said:
I'm sure this is exactly how seal-clubbers see themselves; as stewards of nature. And I'm certain they're doing it to take care of our natural resources. Not for, oh, I don't know... the money.
Belittle it at your peril. It has nothing to do with hunters; we as a civilization must realize that Earth's ecosystems will live or die because of our actions or inactions, it is no longer tenable to pretend we can just leave nature alone.


dotman said:
Cut me a break. Go ask any five year old.
So humour me. If we saw things the same way, we wouldn't be having this discussion would we? Pretending it's obvious is a cop-out. Answer the question.

I once again contend that your argument is emotional, which is why you're resorting to the "it's so obvious" defense. If you have a rational response, you are obliged to state it.

dotman said:
It wasn't an analogy. It was a question. Would you take your dog into be put to sleep, if you knew the method used was clubbing? Go ahead and answer that question, and then feel free to try and argue its validity or not. But answer it first.
OK, we'll do it the long way for you.

No I wouldn't. So what? Relevance?

dotman said:
Clubbing is brutal.
You specifically said "They club the animals because the animals aren't able to defend themselves." You then in the same breath claimed that hunting (by which, again, I assume you mean with guns) was a different matter.

So I ask again: How can animals better defend themselves from guns?

dotman said:
I don't pay my bills with awareness. Do you? Come on, at this point, its almost like you're going out of your way to argue with me here.
Are you completely missing it? Money does not come until the public at large is aware of the issue.

I can contribute $100 of my own, and at the end I'll have $100 for my cause. Or I can spend $100 on increasing awareness of the issue, reach 10,000 people, of which 1% might sympathize and contribute their own $100. I now have $10,000 for my cause.

This is as basic as 2+2=4; it astonishes and alarms me that you seem to be missing this.
 
  • #36
A man has to make his living somehow, and if that involves hitting a seal over the head with a crowbar, than so be it. People are too sensitive now-a-days.

Seals are pests, cute pests with fluffy fur that just so happens to look awesome on the inside of a female jacket.

Is clubbing seals wrong? No, it is a lot better than shooting them. Cheaper too. If you shoot a seal you will lose money because the fur around the entry and exit wounds will be damaged yielding a lower price in the market.
 
  • #37
MotoH said:
A man has to make his living somehow, and if that involves hitting a seal over the head with a crowbar, than so be it. People are too sensitive now-a-days.

Seals are pests, cute pests with fluffy fur that just so happens to look awesome on the inside of a female jacket.

Is clubbing seals wrong? No, it is a lot better than shooting them. Cheaper too. If you shoot a seal you will lose money because the fur around the entry and exit wounds will be damaged yielding a lower price in the market.

I'm not really sure this is your most convincing argument to win over naysayers... :rolleyes:
 
  • #38
Simply a hypothetical question, but if you were caught in a baby seal field (lol) in the middle of winter, where it is -40F and you would die if you have no way to keep warm, and all you had was a club. Would you bash some baby seals heads into survive the night? Or would you place yourself at the bottom of the evolutionary ladder because "they are so cuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuute!1231(*!(@#!"
 
  • #39
MotoH said:
Simply a hypothetical question, but if you were caught in a baby seal field (lol) in the middle of winter, where it is -40F and you would die if you have no way to keep warm, and all you had was a club. Would you bash some baby seals heads into survive the night? Or would you place yourself at the bottom of the evolutionary ladder because "they are so cuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuute!1231(*!(@#!"
MotoH, dotman has preceded you in resorting to emotional appeals and faulty analogies. If you engage him at this level, you will find yourself on a battlefield where these logical fallacies are fair game.

Engage him on a rational level, and he will have no recourse except logic, which will eventually force him to learn something or to walk away.

Note that this discission will outlive both dotman's and our participation. It will live in perpetuity for others to see and learn how issues are handled rationally.
 
  • #40
I'm sorry, are you on the Pro-club side? Because I can come in here with some smashing (get it?) points on how seal clubbing is beneficial to humans and animals alike
 
  • #41
MotoH said:
I'm sorry, are you on the Pro-club side? Because I can come in here with some smashing (get it?) points on how seal clubbing is beneficial to humans and animals alike
What side am I on? I am on the rational side. There are reasons both for and against. I just wish to be sure that rationality prevails. No emotional appeals, no 'it's so obvious' cop-outs.

There are compelling reasons for seal hunts. And we here in the south not liking it is simply not a compelling reason to stop it. As to how they are killled, that is a more subtle question. It needs to be addressed in terms of prods and cons. But I do agree that "don't kill them because they're cute" is not a valid argument.
 
  • #42
I am glad you are off the fence. It must have been uncomfortable up there :smile:

First of all, they are not baby seals. They have to be at least 1 year old, and can not have their white fur. This applies to commercial and personal hunting of seals.

Why use a club? Well I will first explain to the best of my ability the personal side, and the commercial side.

If you are of the Inuit, or other tribes of Alaska and Canada in the coastal areas. You are not going to have a lot of money, especially if you live the traditional way. A device that uses an electrical charge is far to expensive, and ammunition doesn't come cheap. A club can be made out of anything. Also tradition comes into play. They have been doing this for 4,000 years, if they found a quicker and more humane way to kill seals, they would have found it already. Trust me, the native cultures all around the world hold great admiration to the animals they hunt for food and accessories. The Ojibwe people refer to every animal as brother, and they have great respect for the animal they killed because it has given up it's life for them. The Inuit who club seals are not cruel heartless people just there to kill animals, it is part of their culture, and they go about it very carefully as to cause the least amount of pain to the animal.

On the commercial side, they probably have a better way to go about this I just haven't read into it enough. I don't really know the figures on how much seal meat and skin are going for, but if it is a pretty good ammount, then their should be some R&D in some sort of quicker, more efficient and less painful way of killing seals, while being cost effective also.
Who knows, maybe the club is the best way to knock these seals out.

The one thing I know for sure, is the animal rights activists have blown this (as they have with everything else they do. I'm looking at you PETA) way out of proportion.
 
  • #43
MotoH said:
Why use a club?
And somedthing you sort of touched on but didn't explicitly say: clubs actually limit the kill count. One man, one club = one seal at a time.

I would be an interesting publicity stunt to have a race. Send out two men, one with a gun and the other with a club, and see how many the gunman could kill in the time (and effort!) it took the clubber to kill just one.
 
  • #44
Very good point!

Playing on the human mind here.

I guarantee you the person with the gun will feel less attached to his prey, and will be willing to kill more than the man with the club because he can fire at a distance.
The man with the club will look for the right seal, and will feel far more connected to his prey than the gunman. When you can see the "whites" of your preys eyes, it brings far more emotion into play. I know when I bow hunt and when I rifle hunt, they are two far different things.
 
  • #45
MotoH said:
Very good point!

Playing on the human mind here.

I guarantee you the person with the gun will feel less attached to his prey...

I was being more pragmatic. You could probably shoot a dozen seals dead from 50 yards in the time it takes someone to run up within arms' reach and club one.

dotman wants to arm them all??

Maybe we should throw our own faulty analogy at him...

You and fifty of your friends are standing around in a schoolyard. A man pulls up at the curb and gets out, obviously aiming to kill as many of you as possible. What would you rather he be carrying? A club or a rifle?
 
  • #46
If seals were meant to have guns, they would have opposable thumbs. 'Nuf said.

edit in reply to your edit:

depends, are we all fat and can't run, or are we athletic?

If fat, the gun. Just shoot me and get over with it, I am not running

If skinny, the club. Who can't run from a man with a club? (seals apparently)
 
  • #47
I'm not going to argue with you about whether clubbing baby seals is wrong or not. I think you might argue with me here about it, because the anonymity of the internet means you don't actually have to look someone in the eye and say, 'Yes, I support clubbing baby seals to death.'

But I doubt you'd say that at your kid's PTA meeting to his friend's mother up the street, if the subject came up. I only have one thing to respond to, because I found it semi-funny:

DaveC426913 said:
Are you completely missing it? Money does not come until the public at large is aware of the issue.

I can contribute $100 of my own, and at the end I'll have $100 for my cause. Or I can spend $100 on increasing awareness of the issue, reach 10,000 people, of which 1% might sympathize and contribute their own $100. I now have $10,000 for my cause.

Isn't this how every pyramid scheme you've ever been pitched started? It doesn't work that way, in the real world. Ask Wall Street.

The problem is 'might sympathize and contribute $100'. Your numbers are faulty because a) you're not going to reach 10,000 people with $100, and b) the people you do reach aren't going to contribute $100. It's simply not that easy to raise money for these things.

On a practical level, focusing on raising money, and not 'raising awareness' (whatever that means), is a more effective way to actually get dollars into the hands of folks who could use them.

To the OP, I say, focus on raising money. Awareness will come.
 
  • #48
dotman said:
the anonymity of the internet means you don't actually have to look someone in the eye and say, 'Yes, I support clubbing baby seals to death.'
Yes, because this issue never existed before the internet...:rolleyes:

Look. We get it. You think clubbing seals is wrong.

Do you not get that this is not the only viewpoint it is possible to have? Do you seriously think the rest of us have trouble sleeping?
 
  • #49
Jurrasic said:
OK No, the thread is NOT to discuss whether or not it is important to stop seal bashing but to discuss impactful ways to stop the seal bashing , it would after all take some really creative and good ideas to accomplish this most likely. Your post is not on the correct thread, Have you tried starting your own thread asking others whether or not it is important because , as said, this thread is not about what you are off in a corner discussing amongst yourself, totally different topic.

create anthropomorphic sculptures that blur the line between human and seal in an attempt to evoke empathy in the viewer.

http://beinart.org/modules/Word-Press/2007/05/06/patricia-piccininis-anthropomorphic-sculpture/
 
  • #50
DaveC426913 said:
Look. We get it. You think clubbing seals is wrong.

Do you not get that this is not the only viewpoint it is possible to have? Do you seriously think the rest of us have trouble sleeping?

You think clubbing seals is right? This is an actual question. Do you think clubbing seals is right? Answer this, yes or no. My answer is no. I state that explicitly.

As far as me not getting possible viewpoints, I get that. But in this conversation, I am the only one who has given actual advice to the OP, twice now in fact. What have you done, except argue with me?

dotman said:
To the OP, I say, focus on raising money. Awareness will come.
 
Back
Top