What would the *Energy equation be for this problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Np14
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the energy equation for a rubber ball swung in a vertical circle, focusing on the conservation of energy principle. Participants debate the relationship between gravitational potential energy (Ug) and kinetic energy (K), emphasizing that total energy remains constant. The gravitational potential energy is defined as m*g*h, with height changing throughout the motion, while kinetic energy is also involved. Clarification is sought on how to express total energy mathematically and where to set gravitational potential energy to zero. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately representing energy terms in the context of physics problems.
Np14
Messages
27
Reaction score
2
1. A 0.1 kilogram solid rubber ball is attached to the end of an 0.80 meter length of light thread. The ball is swung in a vertical circle, as shown in the diagram above. Point P, the lowest point of the circle, is 0.20 meter above the floor. The speed of the ball at the top of the circle is 6.0 meters per second, and the total energy of the ball is kept constant.

2. **ex. (Ug + Wf = K)

3. Would it just be Ug = k
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Np14 said:
1. A 0.1 kilogram solid rubber ball is attached to the end of an 0.80 meter length of light thread. The ball is swung in a vertical circle, as shown in the diagram above. Point P, the lowest point of the circle, is 0.20 meter above the floor. The speed of the ball at the top of the circle is 6.0 meters per second, and the total energy of the ball is kept constant.

2. **ex. (Ug + Wf = K)

3. Would it just be Ug = Ug ?
url

Please post the diagram related to the question and refrain from using boldface for everything. Also, Ug is always equal to itself. Please make a better effort to show your reasoning.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Please state your question clearly. (Instead of linking to that other page, just cut and paste the relevant part and upload it here.)
 
  • Like
Likes Np14
kuruman said:
Please post the diagram related to the question and refrain from using boldface for everything. Also, Ug is always equal to itself. Please make a better effort to show your reasoning.

I don't think you understand how an energy equation works.
 
Np14 said:
I don't think you understand how an energy equation works.
You wrote Ug = Ug. What did you mean by that?
 
Doc Al said:
You wrote Ug = Ug. What did you mean by that?

I meant that energy is conserved. Since the equation for PE is m*g*h, the height is changing in both instances. So the force of gravity on the object must change as well.
 
Np14 said:
I meant that energy is conserved.
Well, that's not what you wrote.

Np14 said:
Since the equation for PE is m*g*h, the height is changing in both instances. So the force of gravity on the object must change as well.
The force of gravity won't change, but the gravitational PE will.

Just write an expression for the total energy and set it equal to a constant.
 
Np14 said:
I meant that energy is conserved. Since the equation for PE is m*g*h, the height is changing in both instances. So the force of gravity on the object must change as well.

I honestly have no clue what the equation would be for this problem. No work is being done since the displacement is zero, but I don't know if the PE becomes zero as well once the object goes to the bottom of the circle.
 
Only two forms of energy are involved here. One is potential. What's the other?
 
  • #10
Doc Al said:
Only two forms of energy are involved here. One is potential. What's the other?

Kinetic I guess.
 
  • #11
Np14 said:
Kinetic I guess.
Exactly. So the total energy is PE + KE. Since energy is conserved, PE + KE = const.

You can write an expression for each energy term and evaluate their total.
 
  • #12
By const, you mean a constant, nonzero number?

What would that represent?
 
  • #13
Np14 said:
By const, you mean a constant, nonzero number?
Sure.

Np14 said:
What would that represent?
The total energy!
 
  • Like
Likes Np14
  • #14
That is what I figured, thanks
 
  • #15
Np14 said:
That is what I figured, thanks
Can you find a numerical value for that constant? Please specify where you take the gravitational potential energy to be zero.
 
  • #16
Np14 said:
kuruman said:
Please post the diagram related to the question and refrain from using boldface for everything. Also, Ug is always equal to itself. Please make a better effort to show your reasoning.

I don't think you understand how an energy equation works.
In Post #4 of this thread, you made the above comment.

You might be interested to know that @kuruman is a retired physics professor with a PhD degree. He certainly understands the principle of Conservation of Energy.
( I suppose that his avatar doesn't look all that professorial , )
 
Last edited:
Back
Top