Whats the best way to set up a table so it is more stable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jordi1986
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Stable Table
AI Thread Summary
To achieve better stability for a rectangular table with 'L' shaped legs, positioning the legs in a '¬' configuration is recommended as it provides a wider base and better weight distribution. The natural frequency of oscillation suggests that a lower frequency is preferable for stability, which can be achieved by ensuring the legs are securely attached to the plank. Additionally, the distance between the legs should be optimized; placing them farther apart enhances stability by reducing the likelihood of tipping. Attaching the legs to the plank can help suppress oscillations more effectively than allowing them to touch the ground. Overall, careful consideration of leg placement and attachment methods is crucial for a stable table setup.
Jordi1986
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi , not sure if this is the best place to set this question, if not please tell me where.. me and my friend are arguing about the best way to set a table, we have a rectangular plank and four legs in 'L' shape, how do we put the legs so they sustain the plank better? like this : L or ¬ ? and why? what sort of formula defends the answer? thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here are some factors for you to consider.

1. The natural frequency of oscillation in a vertical or horizontal part of the leg. How does it depend on the length of the part? Do you want higher or lower frequency for more stability? How can you suppress oscillations better, by attaching a part to the plank, or allowing it to touch the ground?

2. How far apart the legs should be. What's better, far or near?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top