What's the difference between Lorentz factor for frames and for particles?

BomboshMan
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Lorentz factor for moving inertial reference frames is

λ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v<sup>2</sup>}{c<sup>2</sup>}}},

where v is the relative velocity between the frames. But in my textbook (I'm only just learning relativity), it says the Lorentz factor for a particle is

λp = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{u<sup>2</sup>}{c<sup>2</sup>}}},

where u is the velocity of the particle...but what's the difference between these two expressions?

The textbook introduces λp during the derivation of relativistic momentum, so I'm fine with where it came from, but then without explanation the book starts using it for time dilation Δt = λpΔ\tau. Little confused so would love it if someone could clear this up for me.

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two different, but related, concepts:
  1. Time dilation for a particle.
  2. Time dilation for a coordinate transformation.

For particle time dilation: (For simplicity, let's just look at one spatial dimension)
If a particle travels along some trajectory described by an equation such as:

x = f(t)

where (x,t) are coordinates in an inertial Cartesian coordinate system, then the proper time \tau experienced by the particle as it travels along the trajectory is given by:

\tau = \int \sqrt{1-\dfrac{v^2}{c^2}} dt

where v = \dfrac{df}{dt}

For coordinate transformation time dilation: (Again, just using one spatial dimension): Suppose you have two inertial Cartesian coordinate systems (x,t) and (x&#039;,t&#039;), such that the spatial origin of the primed system moves at speed v relative to the unprimed system. Let e_1 and e_2 be two events (points in spacetime). Let (\delta(x),\delta(t)) be their separation according to the unprimed coordinate system, and (\delta(x&#039;),\delta(t&#039;)) be their separation according to the primed coordinate system.

If

\delta(x&#039;) = 0

(so the two events take place at the same location, according to the primed coordinate system), then

\delta(t&#039;) = \sqrt{1-\dfrac{v^2}{c^2}} \ \delta(t)

Time dilation for particles is a physical effect, which is actually measurable. Time dilation for coordinate systems is just a property of a particular coordinate transformation (the Lorentz transformation). However, they are related, in the sense that the Lorentz transformation is what you would expect to apply if you create a coordinate system based on time-dilated clocks (so you can derive the LT from particle time dilation), and the other way around, if you assume that the laws of physics governing clocks is Lorentz-invariant and insensitive to past history of accelerations, then clock time dilation is derivable.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top