What's the Difference Between Nanodots and Quantum Nanodots?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rrcmks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
AI Thread Summary
Nanodots and quantum nanodots are similar in size but differ in their properties. Nanodots are defined by their nanoscale dimensions in three directions, while quantum dots exhibit observable quantum effects due to their size. The distinction arises because quantum dots are often made from materials with varying electrical properties, which affect charge carriers' behavior. When the dimensions of these materials reach a few nanometers, quantum mechanics becomes necessary to describe their behavior. Therefore, while all quantum dots can be considered nanodots, not all nanodots qualify as quantum dots.
rrcmks
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Basically I'm an organic electrochemist.
Can any nanosized magnetic materials classified under nanodots ? If so what is the materialistic difference between nanodots & qunatum nanodots?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org


The confusion here is understandable. The two materials you describe are roughly the same size. That is, a nanodot or nanosphere may be the same size as a quantum dot. Furthermore, there is a little 'fuzzyness' in the term nano as it is a bit of a buzzword that people co-opt to make their research sound more interesting. This being said, the label 'quantum' refers to materials where quantum effects are perceptible. Allow me to explain this more explicitly:

Like a baseball reacts to gravitational potential energy, charge carriers (like electrons and holes) react to electrical potential energy. Different materials can have different electrical potential energies, and so one way to make quantum dots is to combine materials with different electrical properties. For example, you can grow GaAs on AlGaAs (Gallium Arsenide on Aluminum Gallium Arsenide... examples of compound semiconductors). These materials have different band gap energies and electrons moving in the conduction band and holes moving in the valence band will 'feel' different potential energies when traveling in GaAs than AlGaAs. If you make the GaAs layer small enough the potential well becomes thinner and classical statistics no longer describe the behavior of the charge carriers accurately and one must use quantum mechanics. This typically occurs when a size dimension reaches a few nanometers. Thus a quantum well may be very wide and long, but only a few nanometers thick (1D of confinement), a quantum wire will be long but not thick or wide (2Ds of confinement), and at last a quantum dot will not be very thick, wide, or long (3Ds of confinement).

Bottom line: It's a nanodot when it has nanoscale dimensions in three directions. It's a quantum dot when it exhibits quantum properties. A quantum dot can also be a nanodot, a nanodot is not necessarily a quantum dot. See attached files for representations of a quantum well, quantum rods, and quantum dots.
 

Attachments

  • QW.png
    QW.png
    11.1 KB · Views: 685
  • QRs.png
    QRs.png
    23.8 KB · Views: 664
  • QDs.png
    QDs.png
    24.4 KB · Views: 682
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top