Whats the differnce between phase and group velocity?

AI Thread Summary
Phase velocity refers to the speed of the peaks and troughs of a single frequency wave, while group velocity is the speed at which wave packets or pulses, composed of multiple frequencies, propagate. Group velocity is typically less than the wave velocity and is associated with the average information traveling through the wave group. In cases of dispersion, the group velocity can differ from the phase velocity, and it can even be negative under certain conditions, such as in materials with anomalous dispersion. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding these concepts in the context of wave behavior and propagation, emphasizing that confusion often arises in their definitions and implications. Overall, these distinctions are crucial for comprehending wave dynamics in various physical contexts.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
whats the differnce between phase and group velocity??

from what i understand (and this could be flawed) is that group velocity is the velocity of the wave packets being sent out by the object (or particle) and phase velocity is velocity of the wavepeaks which actually travel faster than the group velocity.

can you explain or point out a place which explaisn this??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These concepts are based on the idea of a traveling wave -- i.e. think of a water wave which is a single traveling sinusoid.
If you assemble a group of such waves( of different frequency ) they reinforce and cancel each other at regular intervals .
If they are all traveling at the same rate the peak of the group travels at a different rate than the individuals -- this is group velocity.
Group velocity is the speed with which the average information about the whole group travels and is always less than the wave velocity -- this is exemplified in metals which have a -ve refractive index indicating that the wave velocity is > than light in vaccuo , but the group velocity is less than light .
This is simply illustrated by sine waves there is no paradox here.
Ray
 
The phase velocity can be thought of as the speed of a pure monochromatic wave or the speed of a single frequency. Specifically, it is the speed of the peaks and troughs that make up the wave.

The group velocity can be thought of as the speed of the propagating temporal interference pattern produced by multiple spectral components traveling at different speeds in a material. Since a pulse is made up of many spectral components, the group velocity is usually associated with the speed of pulse propagation.

rayjohn01 said:
These concepts are based on the idea of a traveling wave -- i.e. think of a water wave which is a single traveling sinusoid.
If you assemble a group of such waves( of different frequency ) they reinforce and cancel each other at regular intervals .
True. That is what I mean above by temporal interference.
If they are all traveling at the same rate the peak of the group travels at a different rate than the individuals -- this is group velocity.
No, this is not true. If the different components of the wave are all traveling at the same speed, there is no dispersion (by definition). In such situations, the peak will travel exactly at the same speed of the components since the interference pattern will not change. Hence, in the situation you describe, the phase velocity will equal the group velocity. The group velocity will only become different than the phase velocity when you have dispersion.
Group velocity is the speed with which the average information about the whole group travels and is always less than the wave velocity -- this is exemplified in metals which have a -ve refractive index indicating that the wave velocity is > than light in vaccuo , but the group velocity is less than light .
Not true. Do not confuse the information velocity and the group velocity. The group velocity is often equal to the information velocity, but that is not always true. Also, the group velocity is not always less than the phase velocity. The group velocity can be much, much less than c (~10 m/s), equal to c, greater than c, or even negative.

Negative group velocities are the case where the anomalous dispersion (higher frequency light travels faster than lower frequency light) is so large that peak of the pulse exits the material before it enters. While this seems to violate causality, a careful examination reveals that the pulse is actually reshaped so that the leading edge of the pulse becomes the new peak and the old peak becomes absorbed (and forms the trailing edge of the new pulse). A good paper that deals with this issue of negative group velocities and information velocity is Stenner et al., Nature 425, 695 (2003).


This is simply illustrated by sine waves there is no paradox here.
True, but there seems to be a lot of confusion. Stunner, do a google search on "group velocity." There are many helpful sites out there on the subject.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top