What's the solution to this difference equation?

phoenixthoth
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
2
an+1=2an where n is a natural number and a0 is some fixed real number. (in case it's not clear, what's on the right hand side is 2 to the an power.) thanks!

i'm wondering if it will be possible to let n=1/2 and have the half iterate to 2^x i was looking for earlier, where by that i mean a function such that f(f(x))=2^x. I'm guessing that solving one problem would be roughly as difficult as the other...

if you happen to know of a good article on nonlinear difference equations, i'd appreciate it. I'm also looking at the logistic.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
an+1 = 2an = 22an-1 = ...

And since: abc = abc

an = 22a0(n - 1)

I think. (And it seems to work too for a few calculations... the numbers do quickly get out of hand though.)
 
Last edited:
You have the order of operations wrong.

Correct:

<br /> a^{b^c} = a^{\left( b^c\right)}<br />

wrong

<br /> a^{b^c} = \left( a^b \right) ^c<br />
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
942
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top