Wheels and Crazy Spinning Things

  • Thread starter Thread starter dazedandconfused
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spinning Wheels
AI Thread Summary
When two wheels of the same diameter roll forward at 4 miles per hour, the belts connected to smaller hubs will rotate at different rates. Calculations indicate that the hub connected to the larger wheel will spin faster due to its greater circumference, leading to a higher RPM for the smaller hub. The relationship between the wheel sizes and their respective hubs confirms that belt "D2" will indeed rotate hub "C2" more quickly than belt "D1" rotates hub "C1." While the initial calculations appear correct, it's advisable to verify them for accuracy. Exploring these dynamics offers intriguing insights into rotational mechanics.
dazedandconfused
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Wheels and Crazy Spinning Things!

For the illustration of the following model, go to http://www.corniceventures.com/images/wheels.JPG

If the 2 wheels ("B1" and "B2") are the same diameter (40 inches) and are rolling forward at 4 miles per hour...Would belts "D1" and "D2" rotate hubs "C1" and "C2" respectively at the same rate (rpm's)?

Here are all the parameters:

"B1" and "B2" Diameter >> 40 inches
"A" Diameter >> 12 inches
"C1" and "C2" Diameter >> 1 inch

Here is what my calculations told me:

"B2" Circumference >> ~125.66 inches
"A" Circumference >> ~37.70 inches
"C1" and "C2" Circumference >> ~3.14 inches
"B2" RPMs at 4 MPH >> ~33.61 rpm
"A" RPMs at 4 MPH >> ~112.05 rpm
"C1" and "C2" RPMs at 4 MPH >> ~1344.54 rpm

To me it seems that belt "D2" would rotate hub "C2" more quickly than belt "D1" would rotate hub "C1" given the same forward speed, but maybe I should trust my calculations! Any help would be appreciated, thanks in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Both big wheels spin with ω = 4mph/40in. (convert that into rpm)

Assuming the belts don't slip:
ωA*rA = ωC1*rC1

and

ωB2*rB2 = ωC2*rC2

Note that ωA = ωB2 = ω

Rearrange to find one hub speed in terms of the other:

\omega_{C1} = \frac{r_A}{r_{C1}}\,\frac{r_{C2}}{r_{B2}}\omega_{C2}

and since the hubs (C1 & C2) are the same size:

\omega_{C1} = \frac{r_A}{r_{B2}}\omega_{C2}

So the hubs spin at different rates; since the radius (diameter) of B2 is greater than A, Hub C2 will spin faster than hub C1. So, your intuition was good, but there was some error in your calculations (I can't say where you went wrong without seeing your work). You should follow this line of thought out yourself to understand the idea and to double-check the algebra.
 


Based on your calculations, it does appear that belt "D2" would rotate hub "C2" at a faster rate than belt "D1" would rotate hub "C1" if they were both moving at the same speed. This is because the circumference of "B2" is larger than the circumference of "A", which means it will make more rotations in the same amount of time. This, in turn, will cause the smaller belt "D2" to rotate at a faster rate in order to keep up with the larger wheel.

It's always a good idea to double check your calculations and make sure everything is accurate, but based on the information provided, your calculations seem to be correct. It's also important to note that there may be other factors at play, such as friction and the weight of the wheels, that could affect the rotation speed. Overall, it's a fun and interesting concept to explore!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top