When balancing chemical equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter J_o_S
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemical
AI Thread Summary
Altering chemical formulas changes the identity of the compounds involved, resulting in a different reaction and equation. The chemical formulas represent specific elements and their ratios, which are crucial for accurate balancing. Balancing a chemical equation requires equal numbers of atoms for each element on both sides. Changing the formulas disrupts this balance, leading to inaccuracies. Therefore, maintaining the original chemical formulas is essential for proper equation balancing.
J_o_S
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
why can't the chemical formulas be altered?


I was asked this question, and my answer was because if you alter the formulas you're dealing with totally different chemicals, and therefore a different equation.

Seems like such a simple question, but its surrounded by harder ones which makes me worry :frown: so I just wanted to see if I was missing anything. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds right to me. Although I would say

if you alter the formulas you're dealing with totally different chemicals, and therefore a different reaction.
 
.Your answer is correct. The chemical formulas represent the specific elements and their ratios in a compound. If you alter the formulas, you are essentially changing the identity of the compounds involved, which would result in a different chemical equation. Balancing a chemical equation involves making sure that the number of atoms of each element on the reactant side is equal to the number of atoms on the product side. Altering the formulas would disrupt this balance and make the equation inaccurate.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top