When Can You Pretend All the Mass is at the Center of Mass?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on when it is appropriate to treat an object's mass as concentrated at its center of mass. It highlights that this simplification is useful for analyzing the motion of extended objects, especially when different parts are moving at varying speeds. However, it notes that in scenarios like car crash testing or analyzing forces on airplanes, treating the object as a single point mass may not be accurate. The conversation reflects on the practical applications of center of mass in real-world situations, particularly in human movement and engineering contexts. Understanding these limitations is crucial for accurate modeling in physics.
Dr_bug
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Discuss when you can and can’t “pretend all the mass of an object is concentrated at the center of mass”.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


So I don't really understand what this is supposed to mean. I know that you utilize center of mass when trying to describe the motion of an extended object where different parts of the object is moving with different speeds. But so far i haven't come across anything you really couldn't use this... and explosion problem maybe... i don't really know and would appreciate some input thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe when explaining the motion of large objects, like aeroplanes or human movements
 
well you actually do use center of mass to describe human movements because that's an example that my textbook uses...
 
Dr_bug said:
well you actually do use center of mass to describe human movements because that's an example that my textbook uses...

Well I meant like in testing car crashes, I don't think they consider the entire body as one point mass.


OR analysis of the forces on an aeroplane.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Center of mass and momentum- A question about systems
Replies
25
Views
1K
Misunderstanding Work-energy theorem and center of mass properties
Replies
7
Views
2K
Finding the center of mass of a simple 2D shape
Replies
9
Views
3K
Finding the center of mass of a solid hemisphere
Replies
19
Views
3K
How to find the center of mass of a cube?
Replies
6
Views
7K
Trivial : Use of "negative sign" when calculating centroid
Replies
12
Views
3K
What are the forces on the center of mass?
Replies
7
Views
3K
Finding the POSITION of the center of mass
Replies
2
Views
2K
Center of mass of a disk with a hole
Replies
8
Views
4K
What are the steps for calculating the center of mass of this object?
Replies
9
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top