When do quantum effects become important?

AI Thread Summary
Quantum effects become significant in gravitational calculations at extremely small length scales, specifically below 1 x 10^-35 meters. This conclusion is derived from dimensional analysis involving Planck's constant (\hbar) and the gravitational constant (G). By combining these constants and the speed of light (c), the analysis reveals that quantum effects are tied to the behavior of these fundamental constants. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding how to manipulate these dimensions to arrive at meaningful conclusions. The participant seeks confirmation of their calculations, indicating a learning process in dimensional analysis.
andyfry
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
At what length scale do quantum effects become important in gravitational calculations??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can figure this out from a scaling argument. The gravitational constant, G, has dimensions of (length)3(mass)-1(time)-2 or, in shorthand, L3M-1T-2. The speed of light, c, is the universal conversion between time and distance, since it has units of LT-1.

Finally, quantum effects are characterized by Planck's constant h, or more commonly used \hbar, which has units of L2M T-1. If \hbar were zero, quantum effects would not exist, so in the limit that \hbar \rightarrow 0, the length scale where quantum effects becomes important must also go to zero. So our length scale must depend on \hbar to a positive power.

Can you see how to combine \hbar and G to eliminate the mass scale? How about how to combine powers of c with the result to convert time to length units?
 
Yeah, this was what I was trying to do! Thought i had solved it correctly and was just looking for confirmation. However I've now noticed I got a few dimensions confused. I'll try again...
Multiplying G and \hbar gives dimensions of L5T-3.
c-3 will have dimensions L-3T-3 (I believe?)
So multiplying by this gives dimensions L2
Looking at the indices (10-34*10-11(108)-3) gives a magnitute of 10-69 for L2.
So quantum effects must be taken into account below 1*10-35m!
I hope that was right... :S Dimensional analysis is pretty new to me!
 
Pretty sure this is correct.
Would be great if someone could just confirm please?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top