When do you are finished with a book that you are learning

  • Thread starter Thread starter samspotting
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
AI Thread Summary
Lectures often fail to cover all necessary material, leading students to skim through theorems during self-study. While students may feel they understand these concepts, true comprehension requires deeper knowledge and experience. The ability to prove theorems is not a prerequisite for understanding, but it typically emerges as a result of grasping the underlying principles. Many theorems are direct applications of fundamental ideas, which may not seem obvious until the material is fully understood. This raises the question of whether to revisit the textbook for a more thorough review or to move on to new topics.
samspotting
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Lectures don't teach everything, and learning on your own you skim through a lot of theorems. Sure you understand them, but if you were showed them a few days later and you needed to prove them, then you might not be able to do so.

Do you try and remedy with another pass through the book, or just go on to another one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
samspotting said:
Lectures don't teach everything, and learning on your own you skim through a lot of theorems. Sure you understand them
No you don't. You simply know of them. Understanding requires knowledge and experience.


The ability to prove theorems is not needed for understanding -- but it is usually a consequence of understanding, since a great many theorems are straightforward applications of the basic ideas at hand. (But it won't seem straightforward until you understand the material!)
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
45
Views
7K
Back
Top