When Electric Field is 0 is potential also 0?

AI Thread Summary
Electric potential is defined as the electric potential energy per charge, which is influenced by the electric field created by charges. In conductors, the electric field is zero, leading to a constant electric potential throughout the conductor. This means that while there is no electric field to do work on a charge, the potential can still be constant and non-zero. The confusion arises because a zero electric field indicates that the change in potential is zero, not that the potential itself is zero. Thus, a zero electric field implies constant voltage, which can still be a non-zero value.
Alex Hughes
Messages
54
Reaction score
13
So here is how my book defined electric potential. If you take a charge, it will have a corresponding electric field associated with it. If you put another charge in that electric field, an electrostatic force will act on it and give it kinetic energy. This kinetic energy can't come from thin air, therefore it has to come from the electric potential energy stored in the charges. To account for electric potential energy, an electric potential is defined. The electric potential is simply the electric potential energy per charge. This made sense to me until I got to a part about conductors. They said the electric potential is constant all throughout the conductor, but inside the conductor the electric field is 0. This doesn't make sense to me. Don't you need an electric field in order for a force to act on a charge which would then give it an electric potential. Without any electric field, how could you possibly have an electric potential? I looked online and everybody said zero electric field just means that the CHANGE in potential will be 0, and possibly could mean the potential is 0 but its not certain. Can somebody please explain to me why this is. I'm really confused. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What if the electric field at a point was a direction and the voltage gradient at that point, specified in volts per metre?
 
Alex Hughes said:
If you put another charge in that electric field, an electrostatic force will act on it and give it kinetic energy.
More generally, the potential at a given location is the amount of work per unit charge that you will have to do to slowly move that charge from a defined reference point to the given location. If the given location is a region with no field then the charge can be moved freely anywhere within that region without any additional work. But if there is a field between the region and the reference point then it takes some work to go through that field. In fact, it takes the same amount of work to get anywhere within the region, but because of the intervening field that amount of work is non zero. Therefore, a zero field implies a constant voltage, not a zero voltage.
 
  • Like
Likes Alex Hughes
Dale said:
More generally, the potential at a given location is the amount of work per unit charge that you will have to do to slowly move that charge from a defined reference point to the given location. If the given location is a region with no field then the charge can be moved freely anywhere within that region without any additional work. But if there is a field between the region and the reference point then it takes some work to go through that field. In fact, it takes the same amount of work to get anywhere within the region, but because of the intervening field that amount of work is non zero. Therefore, a zero field implies a constant voltage, not a zero voltage.
Thanks, that makes sense
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Dale
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Back
Top