When is the electrically short really short?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cyclone24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Short
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effective length of wires and cables in relation to their ability to act as antennas, emphasizing that lengths shorter than 1/20 wavelength are typically recommended to avoid radiation issues. However, some sources suggest that even lengths of 1/50 or 1/100 wavelength may still radiate under certain conditions, particularly when considering inductance effects. At 100 MHz, a 2-inch wire can exhibit significant reactance, which can disrupt circuit functionality, especially in sensitive applications like transistor circuits. The conversation highlights that the inductance of wires can create reactive fields that interfere with RF energy transfer, potentially affecting both RF and DC circuits. Overall, the importance of wire length and inductance in circuit design is critical to prevent operational disturbances.
cyclone24
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hello

All this while in the literature it is advised to shorten your wires or cables to less than 1/20 wavelength in order for them to NOT act as antennas.

But I also read that sometimes even 1/50 or 1/100 wavelength at a certain fundamental frequency. For example, at 100 MHz, the wavelength is 3 m. Its 1/20 wavelength is 15 cm. 1/50 is 6 cm. Some say even this is not enough.

I would like to know when is it not enough? What are the conditions where the cable < 1/50 can still radiate? Many military specifications are strict about this and play safe by setting the dimensions too small.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The problem isn't only radiation. It is also inductance.

For example, this site:
http://www.consultrsr.com/resources/eis/induct5.htm
gives a calculator for the inductance of straight wires.

A straight wire 2 inches long and 0.05 inches in diameter will have an inductance of 44 nH.

Doesn't sound like much, but at 100 MHz it will have a reactance of 27 ohms.

This is quite enough to stop many circuits from working properly.
If there was a lead like this in the emitter circuit of a bipolar transistor, or source lead of a FET, it could easily start it oscillating.

At 100 MHz, 2 inches of wire is about 1/60th of a wavelength. This is also about the length of the leads that come with a ceramic capacitor, so these always have to be trimmed leaving only enough wire to solder to.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the reply.

In other words, because of large inductance on the wire, the wire creates reactive fields. These reactive fields when in close proximity of other wires, transfer the RF energy and hence result in emissions. Is this explanation correct? Is this true even in the case of DC circuits?
 
You can get inductive coupling like that, or just having a reactance of 27 ohms in series with a 50 ohm load, or the low input impedance of a transistor amplifier, will totally disturb the operation of the circuit.

Having this much reactance in series with a coil that should be resonant at 100 MHz (with a capacitor) could pull the resonant frequency 10 MHz low, which would stop an amplifier working at all.
(I took an example of a 100 nH coil and 25 pF capacitor resonant at 100 MHz. Adding 27 nF in series with the coil drops the resonant frequency to 89 MHz)
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Back
Top