When it comes to the Young's Double Slit Experiment, I'm just wondering

AI Thread Summary
In the Young's Double Slit Experiment, measuring the distance between adjacent fringes directly can lead to inaccuracies due to the limitations of measurement tools like rulers. Taking an average distance across multiple fringes minimizes errors and enhances precision. This method reduces the impact of any inconsistencies that may arise from individual measurements. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accuracy in scientific experiments. Accurate measurements are crucial for reliable results in physics experiments.
insertnamehere
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
For the Young's Double slit Experiment, I'm just wondering when it comes to finding the distance between the adjacent fringes (shown on the screen), why can't we just measure directly the distance between the adjacent fringes instead of having to measure the distance between 5 fringes and dividing by 5. Can there be inconsistencies when it comes to measuring directly the distance between adjacent fringes? I'm really confused about this. HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the only reason is one of being accurate. My guess is that you did this using a ruler, which is not the most precise of instruments, and doing this reduces your imprecision five-fold.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top