When should I use Gauss's Law for calculating electric fields?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wumbology
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauss's law Law
AI Thread Summary
Gauss's Law is most effective for calculating electric fields in situations with high symmetry, such as infinite charged objects or spherical conductors. The nature of the surface—conducting or insulating—affects the application of Gauss's Law, particularly in how charge distributes itself. For a sphere, whether it is a conductor or insulator influences the electric field calculations at various radii. Point charges and finite-length objects are better analyzed using Coulomb's Law, while Gauss's Law is reserved for symmetrical cases. Overall, Gauss's Law is versatile but has limitations, such as not being applicable for dipoles.
wumbology
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to get a better understanding of when to use Gauss's Law and I would appreciate any help. I know so far that it can be easily used in cases of high symmetry and infinitely long charged objects. Does it matter if the surface is conducting or insulating? If I have, for example, a sphere where I'm trying to find the electric field at several radii inside the sphere AND outside the sphere, would it matter if the sphere was a conductor or an insulator when I apply Gauss's Law (which I'm assuming is correct since a sphere is symmetrical)?

Could I sum it up as saying that point charges and finite length objects need Coulombs Law to find the electric field, whereas infinite objects and extremely symmetrical objects need Gauss's Law? Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
U can apply it in all cases but there are few exceptions like it cannot be used to find electric field due to dipole.It is not used in point objects as coulombs law more easily gives result.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top