When should the Parallel Axis Theorem be used in mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the Parallel Axis Theorem (PAT) in mechanics, particularly in problems involving rolling objects. The user initially applied the theorem correctly for a hoop rolling down an incline but encountered confusion when analyzing a spool being pulled by a string. It was clarified that if the axis of rotation is chosen at the center of mass, the moment of inertia (I) and torques should be calculated about that point, negating the need for PAT. However, if the point of contact with the ground is used as the axis, PAT must be applied to determine the rotational inertia about that point. Ultimately, both methods should yield the same result when applied correctly.
amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
I know what the parallel axis theorem is, but I'm a little confused about when to use it. I recently had a problem where a hoop was rolling down an incline where I used the parallel axis theorem to find the translational acceleration and got it correct. However, I had a problem about a spool being pulled by a string (think of a yo-yo being pulled on the ground), and when I set up the equations I got the wrong answer using the P.A.T. For instance, I had:

F-F_{S}=ma

RF_{S}-rF=I_{CM}\alpha

Why isn't the ICM instead IP? I have solved the problem already and know the answer, I just can't see why the parallel axis theorem is not used. LINK: http://show.imagehosting.us/show/971155/0/nouser_971/T0_-1_971155.jpeg

Thank you for your help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I just depends on what you take as your axis of rotation. If you take the center of mass, then I and torques will be about that point. (And you'll have no need for the parallel axis theorem.)

But you are certainly free to use the point of contact with the floor as your instantaneous axis of rotation. But if you do, be sure to take torques about that point as well. In this case you'll need to use the parallel axis theorem to find the rotational inertia about that point.

Done correctly, you'll get the same answer either way.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top