Where did the expansion for particle accelerators come from?

  • Thread starter Thread starter steve_rb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the expansion of potential for axial traveling beams in particle accelerators, as presented in Stanly Livingston's book "Particle Accelerators." It highlights the derivation of an equation from the Laplace Equation in cylindrical coordinates, specifically for a charge-free region with axial symmetry. The approximation for paraxial electric fields is discussed, detailing how certain coefficients are determined through substitution. The conversation also references additional resources, including a free ebook by Humphries for further exploration of charged particle acceleration principles. The focus remains on the mathematical foundations and applications of these concepts in particle acceleration technology.
steve_rb
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In "Particle Accelerators" book of Stanly Livingston I saw attached potential expansion for the potential of axial traveling beam of particles throght a electrostatic lense. I want to know where this expansion came from? Which expansion is being used and how?
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
In the book "Particle Accelerators" by Livingston and Blewett on page 101, Eq 5-16 is derived from the Laplace Equation in cylindrical coordinates on page 98 Eq 5-6 with ρ=0.

In a charge-free region, the potential V(r,z) with axial symmetry must satisfy Laplace's equation with charge density ρ =0

Laplace's equation in cylindrical coordinates is then

\frac{1}{r}\cdot\frac{\partial}{\partial r}[r\frac{\partial V(r,z)}{\partial r}]+\frac{\partial^2V(r,z)}{\partial z^2} = 0

The following approximation is useful for approximating paraxial electric fields:

V(r,z)=V(0,z)+A r\frac{\partial V}{\partial z}+ B r^2\frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial z^2} + C r^3\frac{\partial^3 V}{\partial z^3}+ D r^4\frac{\partial^4 V}{\partial z^4}

where the partial derivatives are evaluated on the axis. Substituting the second equation into the first yields A = C = 0, and B = -1/4 and D = +1/64.
To see further discussion, look at page 111 Eq 6.2 in the free downloadable ebook by Humphries "Principles of charged Particle Acceleration":

http://www.fieldp.com/cpa.html

Bob S

test Latex equations here http://www.equationsheet.com/textoimage.php
 
Thanks Bob. Great job.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top