Where is a particle most likely to be? (Griffiths Quantum Mechanics)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the properties of wave functions in quantum mechanics, specifically their differentiability and implications for physical realizability. It highlights that while wave functions ideally should be differentiable at all points, they only need to be square integrable to represent valid states. The conversation also addresses how to determine the most probable position of a particle, questioning whether to use the derivative of the wave function or its modulus squared for finding maxima. It concludes that while differentiability is preferred, being differentiable almost everywhere is generally sufficient for practical purposes. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate interpretations in quantum mechanics.
blackbeans
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Hi there, it seems more convenient to post a picture of the problem in question. More specifically, problem 1(c).
Relevant Equations
the schrodinger equation.
The wave function described seems impossible. Wave functions have to be differentiable at all points, right? Otherwise they don't represent a physically realizable state. The wave function in the example isn't differentiable at x=A, the maximum point. Also, for problem (c), I know it's visually simple to see the answer, but for a more general case, how would i find the coordinate where the "particle is most likely to be"? Would I take the derivative of |psi|^2 or |psi| to find the absolute maxima? Do they provide the same result? Is there a simpler method?

Screenshot (47).png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Theoretically, wave functions need only be square integrable. You could, however, look at this sort of function an idealised approximation to a function that would have a differentiable maximum.

As you state, the modulus squared of the wave function represents the PDF of the particle's position. You calculate the maximum as you would for any function, using calculus or otherwise.
 
  • Like
Likes blackbeans
I see. I just assumed that the wave function had to be differentiable everywhere, since its derivative shows up in the Schrodinger Eq. Thank you!
 
blackbeans said:
I see. I just assumed that the wave function had to be differentiable everywhere, since its derivative shows up in the Schrodinger Eq. Thank you!
Technically it's better if it is differentiable. But differentiable almost everywhere is probably good enough
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top