Where is the Center of Gravity of a Car Located?

AI Thread Summary
The center of gravity of a car can be determined by analyzing the forces on the front and back axles. Given a distance of 130 inches between the axles, with 1800 lbs on the back and 2100 lbs on the front, the center of gravity is found by balancing the torques. The correct calculation shows that the center of gravity is 60 inches from the front axle. This method ensures that the net torque due to the car's weight is zero, confirming the position of the center of gravity.
AdnamaLeigh
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Find the center of gravity of a car with respect to the front axle. There is a distance of 130 inches between the front and back axles. There is a force of 1800lbs on the back axle and 2100lbs on the front axle.

I changed 130 inches to meters and I got 3.30m. I changed both 1800lbs and 2100lbs to Newtons and I got 8010N and 9345N respectively. I divided each by 9.8 to get their masses.

I then divided 3.30m by the sum of 817.3g + 953.6g. I got .0019m. So that means that the center of gravity is .0019m away from the front axle or .075inches.

Did I do this correctly? My answer does not seem to make much conceptual sense...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you didn't do this correctly. The center of mass is defined as:
(m_1 x_1 + m_2 x_2 + ...)/M_{total}

But you can also think of the center of mass as that point about which the net torque due the object's weight would be zero. (No need to do any unit conversions.) You have one torque pulling clockwise, the other counterclockwise: set them equal to each other.
 
That makes sense.

I set the CG x inches away from the front axle, which means that it has to be 130-x inches away from the back axle.

1800(130-x)=2100x
234000=3900x
x=60

So the CG must be 60" away from the front axle, which makes sense.

Thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top