Where Is the Electric Field Zero Between Two Negative Charges?

AI Thread Summary
To find the location where the electric field is zero between two negative charges, the electric field contributions from both charges must be equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. The charges are located at x = 6.0 m and x = -4.0 m, with respective magnitudes of -7.1 µC and -4.3 µC. The relationship between the distances from a point between the charges to each charge can be expressed using the equation E = KQ/r². The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly defining the distances (r1 and r2) and considering the direction of the electric fields, which are both directed towards the charges. Clarification is sought on how to set up the equation with a single variable to solve for the position where the electric field is zero.
tuggler
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two points are resting on a string. The first point is resting at x = 6.0 m and has charge q1 =−7.1 µC. The second point is resting at x = −4.0 m and has charge q2 = −4.3 µC.
At what location is the total electric field zero from the two points(other than infinity)?


Homework Equations



E =\frac{KQ}{r^2}

\frac{q_1}{r_1^2} = \frac{q_2}{r_2^2}



The Attempt at a Solution



I divided away the constant K from my second equation because they cancel out when you set them equal to each other.

I don't know what my r_1,r_2 should be here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you set the distance from the first charge x and define the distance from the other with x and the distance between the two charges? Thus you introduce only one variable in one equation.
 
Don't forget that the contribution to the electric field from each charge has direction, so, if the point is between the two charges, the contribution from the charge at x = 6 is pointing in the negative x-direction, and the contribution from the charge at x = -4 is pointing in the positive x-direction.
 
I am not following can you guys elaborate more please?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top