Where on the x-axis will a third charge have no net force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the position on the x-axis where a (-2) micro Coulomb charge experiences zero net force. The participant initially calculated the position as d=6, leading to confusion when encountering a negative square root. Clarification was provided that the equation for force should only consider magnitudes, not signs, for the calculation. The participant resolved the issue by recognizing the need to omit the negative sign for the -4 micro Coulomb charge in the force equation. This understanding allowed them to correctly approach the problem.
bbraves7
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Where on the x-axis would the net force on a (-2) micro Coulomb charge be zero?

*picture attached*

Homework Equations



F = k*(q1q2)/d^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I think the answer is d= 6, making the position on the x-axis = 7. However, when solving my equation, I have to take the square root of a negative number, which obviously has no real answer. I couldn't seem to logic my way around it, so what am I missing? Other than expressing the answer in terms of i, how can I get around this??
 

Attachments

  • scan0001.jpg
    scan0001.jpg
    13.1 KB · Views: 441
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
9 μC = 9×10‒6 C , Similarly ‒4 μC = ‒4×10‒6 C and ‒2 μC = ‒2×10‒6 C.

You have written them as 9‒6 C, ‒4‒6 C, and ‒2‒6 C .

(Maybe you are simply using a non-standard notation.)
 
You need F1 + F2 = 0.

So that F1 = ‒ F2

That should take care of your signs.
 
SammyS said:
9 μC = 9×10‒6 C , Similarly ‒4 μC = ‒4×10‒6 C and ‒2 μC = ‒2×10‒6 C.

You have written them as 9‒6 C, ‒4‒6 C, and ‒2‒6 C .

(Maybe you are simply using a non-standard notation.)

Yeah, I just write it like that as a kind of short hand.

Anyways, I figured out what I was doing wrong. The equation should only be used to calculate the magnitude of the force, so I shouldn't put the negative in the equation for the -4 micro Coulomb charge. That takes care of it. Thanks for the reply though.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top