Where Should Electric Potential Be Zero in Plane Integration?

justaboy
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate potential.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you given the dimensions of the plane or is it an infinite plane? If it is infinite, why not use Gauss's Law?
 
I would normally, but the question explicitly states to solve for V(z) using the first integral. In addition, I'm not given any dimensions.
 
If you are not given any dimensions, then the best you can do is assume that it is an infinite plane. Define an origin anywhere on the plane and consider an element of charge of area dx'dy' at (x', y') from the origin. Then the contribution to the potential at point (x,y,z) from this charge would be

dV=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\frac{n \: dx'dy'}{((x-x')^2+(y-y')^2+z^2))^{1/2}}

Integrate over x' and y' to get the total potential due to all the charges on the plane. Since the plane is infinite, you may choose x=0 and y=0 without loss of generality. You may also convert to polar coordinates if that's easier for you. When you get your final answer, compare with the result from Gauss's Law to check your work.
 
Cheers, great help! :)
 
Anyone?
 
justaboy said:
Which isn't correct, considering the integral result has to be evaluated for r1 < r < r2. What's wrong here?
Why does the integral have to be evaluated over these limits? Do you have a ring of charge with inner diameter r1 and outer diameter r2? For an infinite plane, r goes to infinity which means that your potential diverges. This is to be expected for an infinite charged plate.
 
Oh, I don't mean r1 and r2 as being two separate radii, I just mean they are the limits of integration, and no two limits of integration could give me the correct answer for the potential if that last step is correct. Is it only by evaluating over the surface that the potential diverges?
 
Last edited:
justaboy said:
Oh, I don't mean r1 and r2 as being two separate radii, I just mean they are the limits of integration,
Limits of integration have physical significance. To integrate over the entire plane, you need to set the lower limit to zero and the upper limit to infinity.
and no two limits of integration could give me the correct answer for the potential if that last step is correct. Is it only by evaluating over the surface that the potential diverges? Because the potential is finite and easily calculable using other integrals, like V(z)=\int{E*dz} = -\frac{n*z}{2\epsilon}
And where is the above potential zero, i.e. what is your reference point? It seems that it is zero on the plane at z=0. The summation over point charges assumes that the potential is zero at infinity, not at the origin. So where do you want your potential to be zero, at the plate or at infinity? No matter which you choose, you will end up with a very large (infinite) term to consider. This problem is artificial, in that there is no such thing as an infinite charge plate. One way to get around this is to integrate over r from zero to some radius R to get the potential V(z). Then consider what happens in the limit z/R << 1, i.e. do a Taylor expansion and see what you get.
 
Back
Top