Where Should I Place Image Charges for a Conducting Wall and Charged Sphere?

the_viewer
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We have a conducting and grounded wall for z<0, so \Phi=0 for z<0. In front of this wall, we place a homogeneous charged sphere with radius R and total charge Q. The center of the sphere has a distance of a to the front of the wall.

http://david.muelheims.googlepages.com/image_charges.png

I need to find the electrostatic potential \Phi(\vec{x}) for z>0 with the method of image charges.
I just need the potential outside the sphere. I do not need to determine the potential inside the sphere.

So... Where do I place the image charges?

Homework Equations



All electrostatic equations.

The Attempt at a Solution



I placed a first image charge in the center of the sphere, because a charged sphere acts like a point-charge in it's center. So I can replace the sphere with a single point-charge.
Then I added a second image charge inside the wall with opposite charge -Q. This second charged is placed exactly symmetrical to the first image charge.
So... if the first charge is placed by z=a, I have placed the second at z=-a.

Is this a correct/possible solution for this problem? Or do I need some different approaches here, because the wall has an effect on the charge on the sphere?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are going about this the correct way.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top