Which advanced math courses are favored by top graduate programs?

ryanj123
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hey all.

I'm actually a math and chemistry major at the Univ. of Illinois Chicago. I have a competitive GPA, research experience, and an overal good academic history. What I'm trying to do is plan my advanced math courses to not only be functionable within my area of interests (engineering, applied mathematics, physical chemistry), but are respected and appreciated by graduate admission review boards.

Here are my options.

Analysis II
Topology I & II
Linear Algebra II
Abstract Algebra II
Partial Differential Equations
Complex Analysis
Probability Theory
Statistical Theory
Mathematical Models
Numerical Analysis
Advanced Calculus
Differential Geometry

Any suggestions not listed?

So within the fields of applied mathematics, engineering, and chemistry which would give me the best edge?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you are going for the applied route rather than looking into pure mathematics, Numerical Analysis, PDEs, and Advanced Calculus (assuming you mean vector calculus) are good choices (Numerical Analysis and Advanced Calculus are usually required courses for applied math modules). Complex Analysis and Functional Analysis are also good courses to have.

As for the pure math courses you mentioned - Topology, Analysis, Complex Analysis, Abstract Algebra, and Differential Geometry - they are definitely useful for pure math degrees - in fact all of them (except possibly Differential Geometry) should be taken if you are looking into grad school for pure math. Ring Theory, Field Theory, and Measure Theory are also good courses in pure math. But if you are deciding to go for applied math, most of these courses won't be as useful as taking upper year applied math courses.
 
Since my question is related to the OP's line of inquiry, I hope I'm not hijacking this thread. Is Advanced Calculus usually a course on multivariable calculus/vector calculus? I have taken a rigorous calculus course this past year and I plan to take a rigorous real analysis course this upcoming year. Our school doesn't really offer an honors multivariable calculus course, nor does it have an advanced calculus course. Although I have been reviewing more introductory analysis topics and studying topology on the side, should I work through an advanced calculus text? I have a good grasp of the computational aspects of multivariable calculus, but I will be going through calculus on manifolds by spivak in my real analysis course next year, I think. Thanks.
 
For admission to graduate school in mathematics. Of the ones listed, the essentials would be Analysis II, Abstract Algebra II. plus subject matter GRE.
 
VeeEight said:
If you are going for the applied route rather than looking into pure mathematics, Numerical Analysis, PDEs, and Advanced Calculus (assuming you mean vector calculus) are good choices (Numerical Analysis and Advanced Calculus are usually required courses for applied math modules). Complex Analysis and Functional Analysis are also good courses to have.

As for the pure math courses you mentioned - Topology, Analysis, Complex Analysis, Abstract Algebra, and Differential Geometry - they are definitely useful for pure math degrees - in fact all of them (except possibly Differential Geometry) should be taken if you are looking into grad school for pure math. Ring Theory, Field Theory, and Measure Theory are also good courses in pure math. But if you are deciding to go for applied math, most of these courses won't be as useful as taking upper year applied math courses.

Thank you for the advice. I agree with you on the applied path, as pure mathematics is something I really don't see in my future (although appreciated of course). Are you familiar with any applied courses that are respected in the physical sciences besides the basic Calculus sequence and Differential Equations? I hear a second course in Linear Algebra, sometimes Complex Analaysis... each opinion varies.

And does anyone know if a course in Statistical Methods or Statistical Theory would be more rigorous?

Does anyone know the type of mathematical training a school such as MIT would want for let's say graduate chemistry (physical), engineering, or geo studies?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top