Which describes the interference at P? (Multiple Choice)

AI Thread Summary
In Young's double-slit interference experiment, a path length difference of 2.50 wavelengths at point P indicates that the interference is at a minimum. The discussion revolves around determining the correct fringe description, with one participant suggesting option D (the second dark fringe) and another arguing for option F (the third dark fringe). The consensus leans towards option F, as a path length difference of 2.5 wavelengths corresponds to the third dark fringe. This conclusion aligns with the principles of wave interference, confirming that the interference at point P is indeed dark. The final agreement supports option F as the correct answer.
McAfee
Messages
96
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



In Young’s double-slit interference experiment, if the rays that reach point P on the viewing screen have a path length difference of 2.50 wavelengths, which describes the interference at P?


A. It is the central bright fringe.
B. It is the first dark fringe to either side of the central bright fringe.
C. It is the first bright fringe to either side of the central bright fringe.
D. It is the second dark fringe to either side of the central bright fringe.
E. It is the second bright fringe to either side of the central bright fringe.
F. It is the third dark fringe to either side of the central bright fringe.
G. It is the third bright fringe to either side of the central bright fringe.
H. It is the fourth dark fringe to either side of the central bright fringe.
I. It is the fourth bright fringe to either side of the central bright fringe.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My friend said he think the answer is D, but I was think F because 2.5 wavelength automatically put you in the third fringe then it is dark because it is at a minimum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
McAfee said:
My friend said he think the answer is D, but I was think F because 2.5 wavelength automatically put you in the third fringe then it is dark because it is at a minimum.
I believe you are correct. :approve:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top