Which filtration method is best for volatile solvents?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuahji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Vacuum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the differences between gravity filtration and vacuum filtration, highlighting their respective advantages and appropriate applications. Gravity filtration is effective for larger particles and is preferred when dealing with low boiling point solvents or hot solutions, as it minimizes risks associated with flammable substances. It allows for better quantitative recovery and is suitable for filtering gel-like substances. In contrast, vacuum filtration excels in filtering very small particles and is often used with filter aids like diatomite. It enables quicker drying of crystals and minimizes losses during rinsing, making it advantageous when time is a factor. However, vacuum filtration is best suited for nonvolatile solvents to prevent contamination from evaporating solvents. The discussion emphasizes the complementary use of both methods for optimal results in various filtration scenarios.
kuahji
Messages
390
Reaction score
2
Just wondering if there was a website or something where I could get more information on the subjects. I understand the methods of procedure, just not the why would one method be used over the other. So, any help or links would be appreciated. :smile:
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
In my own experience, gravity filtration is used for filtering largers size particles through media that is fairly coarse (if you consider #2 Whatman coarse). You can look up the micron size in a chemical supply catalog like the VWR or Fisher catalog. Gravity filtration is also best used when the solvent has a low boiling point such as ether or hexane or when the solution is hot. Pulling a vacuum on hot solutions, especially flammable ones, can cause all kinds of problems. I have also seen vacuum filtration not filter small particles where a gravity filtration works fine. Apparently, vacuum can force some near pore size solids through the filter media where gravity filtration wouldn't. It is easier to quantitatively recover something from a gravity filtration in most cases. Gravity filtration is more useful for filtering gel type substances like nickel DMG.

Vacuum filtration is usually performed with a filter aid such as diatomite. The real advantage for the filter aid/vacuum filtration is in the filtration of very small particles such as decolorizing carbon. Air can be drawn through the filter cake to minimize losses and solvent can be easily applied to rinse a valuable solid. Gravity filtration is not as useful for rinsing crystals, for example, because the rinse solvent would be in contact with the product longer and result in greater losses. Vacuum filtration can be used to dry crystals quickly to speed their analysis. Gravity filtration would require a more lengthy drying step either in the hood or in an oven (or drying thimble).

Vacuum filtration is useful if you are in a hurry but if you don't want to tie yourself up monitoring a filtration, gravity filtration can give you time to do other tasks.

Hope it helps.
 
use both together - simple vacuum filtration is done still under gravity. check your sizes as chemisttree says.

PS vacuum caused by nonflammable solvents will work (try water). Dichloromethane as solvent will work
well.
 
reason:

Vacuum filtration is most suitable for nonvolatile solvents. If vacuum filtration is used with volatile solvent than the solvent might evaporate and contaminate your solid sample.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'How to make Sodium Chlorate by Electrolysis of salt water?'
I have a power supply for electrolysis of salt water brine, variable 3v to 6v up to 30 amps. Cathode is stainless steel, anode is carbon rods. Carbon rod surface area 42" sq. the Stainless steel cathode should be 21" sq. Salt is pure 100% salt dissolved into distilled water. I have been making saturated salt wrong. Today I learn saturated salt is, dissolve pure salt into 150°f water cool to 100°f pour into the 2 gallon brine tank. I find conflicting information about brine tank...
Engineers slash iridium use in electrolyzer catalyst by 80%, boosting path to affordable green hydrogen https://news.rice.edu/news/2025/engineers-slash-iridium-use-electrolyzer-catalyst-80-boosting-path-affordable-green Ruthenium is also fairly expensive (a year ago it was about $490/ troy oz, but has nearly doubled in price over the past year, now about $910/ troy oz). I tracks prices of Pt, Pd, Ru, Ir and Ru. Of the 5 metals, rhodium (Rh) is the most expensive. A year ago, Rh and Ir...
Back
Top