Which Isotope Has Half the Nuclear Radius of Dysprosium-160?

  • Thread starter Thread starter einsteinoid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isotope
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around identifying an isotope with half the nuclear radius of dysprosium-160, which has an atomic number of 66. The correct answer is Neon (Ne), with an atomic mass of 20 and atomic number 10. The user initially misapplied the formula for nuclear radius by confusing atomic mass with atomic number. After clarification, the user acknowledged the mistake and sought further assistance. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting variables in nuclear physics equations.
einsteinoid
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particular isotope of dysprosium has atomic number 66 and atomic mass 159.952202 u. Identify the nucleus with a radius that is one half that of this isotope.

A. Ne (A=20, Z=10) <<<Correct Answer
B. O (A=16, Z=8)
C. Mn (A=50, Z=25)
D. Ni (A=60, Z=28)

Homework Equations


The only relevant equation I can think of is the equation of a nucleus's radius in terms of its atomic number:

r = (1.2X10^-15)(A^[1/3])

The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt has gone as follows:

1. Find the radius of the given dysprosium isotope by plugging it's atomic number into the given formula:

r1 = (1.2X10^-15)(66^[1/3])
r1 = 4.849488E-15 m

2. Now I find the radius of the unknown nucleus:

r2 = (1/2)r1
r2 = 2.424744E-15 m

3. Finally, by plugging the r2 value into the original equation, I should be able to solve for the atomic number of the unknown nucleus:

r2 = 2.424744E-15 m = (1.2X10^-15)(A2^[1/3])

A2 = 8.25

This is obviously not correct, it seems I'm missing a step; possibly one involving the atomic mass, since it is mentioned in the problem. Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
r1 = (1.2X10^-15)(66^[1/3])
This is wrong. A is atomic mass, not atomic number.
 
rl.bhat said:
r1 = (1.2X10^-15)(66^[1/3])
This is wrong. A is atomic mass, not atomic number.

Ahhhhhh, of course. Thanks again rl.bhat!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top