Which Limit Law should I refer to in my solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Abuda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Limit
Abuda
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Evaluate the limit below indicating the appropriate Limit Law(s) implemented.
\lim_{x\rightarrow 0.5}\frac{2x^2+5x-3}{6x^2-7x+2}[/itex]<br /> <br /> <b>2. The attempt at a solution</b><br /> <br /> \lim_{x\rightarrow 0.5}\frac{2x^2+5x-3}{6x^2-7x+2}=\lim_{x\rightarrow 0.5}\frac{2(x-0.5)(x+3)}{6(x-0.5)(x-(2/3))}=\lim_{x\rightarrow 0.5}\frac{2(x+3)}{6(x-(2/3))}=-7[/itex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; So would I be required to state anything when I can out the (x-0.5) factor?&lt;br /&gt; (PS, I&amp;#039;m doing Real Analysis and have learned about proving limits from first principles but I&amp;#039;m now trying to learn about using shortcuts by referencing theorems.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Abuda said:

Homework Statement


Evaluate the limit below indicating the appropriate Limit Law(s) implemented.
\lim_{x\rightarrow 0.5}\frac{2x^2+5x-3}{6x^2-7x+2}

2. The attempt at a solution

\lim_{x\rightarrow 0.5}\frac{2x^2+5x-3}{6x^2-7x+2}=\lim_{x\rightarrow 0.5}\frac{2(x-0.5)(x+3)}{6(x-0.5)(x-(2/3))}=\lim_{x\rightarrow 0.5}\frac{2(x+3)}{6(x-(2/3))}=-7

So would I be required to state anything when I can out the (x-0.5) factor?
(PS, I'm doing Real Analysis and have learned about proving limits from first principles but I'm now trying to learn about using shortcuts by referencing theorems.)

Did you mean so? Do not mix tex and itex.

Say that x--->0.5 means that x tends to 0.5 but never equals to it, so x-0.5 can not equal to zero so you can divide with it. After that explain that the limit of a sum is the sum of the limits, limit of a product with a constant is also equal to the constant times the limit, and the limit of the fraction is equal to the limit of the numerator divided by the (non-zero) limit of the denominator .

ehild
 
Thank you very much for helping me and fixing up my latex skills. Your explanation about canceling sounds good to me and the other notes about the algebra of limits.
Alex
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top