Which Material is Safer for a Swing Safety Pad?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around selecting a safer material for a swing safety pad, comparing two materials based on their Young's Modulus and the implications for impact force and energy absorption during a collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between Young's Modulus, impact force, and energy absorption. Questions arise about the implications of material properties on the duration and force of impact during a collision.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging in a productive exploration of concepts related to impulse and momentum, with some guidance provided on the relationship between collision duration and force. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed without explicit consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the definitions and implications of kinetic energy absorption and the relationship between material properties and impact dynamics. The original poster expresses confusion about these concepts.

Bogus_Roads
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two different materials are being considered for a safety pad below a swing. Material 1 has a Young's Modulus twice that of Material 2. Which should be chosen?

A. Material 2, because the length over which the impact force acts is larger, resulting in a lower average impact force.
B. Material 1, because the length over which the impact force acts is larger, resulting in a lower average impact force.
C. Material 2, because a material with a lower Young's Modulus will absorb kinetic energy more quickly.
D. Material 1, because a material with a higher Young's Modulus will absorb kinetic energy more quickly.

Homework Equations



(\DeltaL/Lo)*E=F/A.

The Attempt at a Solution


\DeltaL is clearly larger with a smaller YM, but does the mean the length over which the impact force acts is larger. Does that then mean that it's lower impact? I've never even come across the idea of absorption of kinetic energy, and I don't think it's obvious that something that is "squishy" should absorb kinetic energy more quickly...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to think of force in a collision as the change in momentum divided by the amount of time it takes.

Therefore, the longer a collision takes, the less force is applied.
 
How do you know greater length acted over=greater time?
 
It's based upon impulse. It's defined better here than I could do myself, so I'll just quote...

In classical mechanics, an impulse is defined as the integral of a force with respect to time. When a force is applied to a rigid body it changes the momentum of that body. A small force applied for a long time can produce the same momentum change as a large force applied briefly, because it is the product of the force and the time for which it is applied that is important. The impulse is equal to the change of momentum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K