Which Method Best Determines Overall Average Velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gersty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Average
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the appropriate method for calculating overall average velocity from multiple trials of linear motion. It highlights that averaging trial times before calculating average velocity is essential when measuring time for a set distance, as this approach accounts for measurement uncertainties. Conversely, if measuring distance over a set time, averaging distances before calculating average velocity is the correct method. The conversation emphasizes that using a mean of the means can lead to inaccuracies, especially when there is significant variation in measurements. Ultimately, the method chosen should depend on the specific experimental setup and the nature of the measurements taken.
Gersty
Messages
47
Reaction score
1
We were told to time the linear motion of 3 objects over a certain distance three times. Then we were to use those times to calculate the object's Vavg for each trial. Finally we were supposed to average these averages to get the overall Vavg for each object.
My question is: Is this an appropriate way to get the overall average velocity of the object over three trials. Wouldn't it be better to average the times and do distance over time with the average times?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your variation comes from the time measurement (and the objects have the same average speed in all repetitions), average the measured times (as those have well-defined uncertainties) and calculate an average velocity based on that.
If your variation comes from something else, it depends on the setup.
 
If the time intervals are equal in each of the three cases then you can take a mean of the means. If not, then you need to calculate total distance over total time or the three measurements don't get equal weighting.
Imagine that there is a wide variation in instantaneous velocity and that you do one measurement over a long interval and two others over very short intervals. The single average over a long interval will have reduced the error considerably but the two extra measurements could be well adrift and they could distort the overall answer out of all proportion with their significance if you take a mean of the means..
 
Gersty
The two methods give different results - one is correct, and one is not, depending upon the setup.

If you are measuring the time to travel a set distance, then the trial times are averaged before calculating the average velocity from the distance / time(avg). The average of the velocities of the trials gives the incorrect result.

If you are measuring the distance traveled in a set time, then the trial distances are averaged before calculating the average velocity from distance(avg) / time. Or in this case you could calculate each trial velocity and average all the trials.

The problem is often asked as follows.
A car travels 60 mph for 1 hour and 30 mph for one hour, what is the average velocity?
Ans, 45 mph. [ 60 miles + 30 miles ) / 2 hours ].
. Or [ ( 60 mph + 30 mph ) / 2 = 45 mph ] with velocity averages.

Which is not the same as; ( this is your experiment )
A car travels 60 miles in one hour and 60 miles in 2 hours, what is the average velocity?
Ans: 40 mph - total distance / total time
. ie [ (60 miles + 60 miles ) / 3 hours ].
Or : 40 mph - by averaging velocities for equal set time intervals
. ie .60, 30, and 30 mph each for 1 hour Avg = ( 60+30+30 ) / 3 = 40 mph
Or : 40 mph - set distance / average time
. ie avg time = 1 hour + 2 hour = 1.5 hour
. Set distance ( 60 miles ) / avg time ( 1.5 hours ) = 40 mph
 
Last edited:
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
210
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top