Which MSE Minor Concentration is Best for an NE Major?

AI Thread Summary
For a nuclear engineering major considering a materials science minor, ceramics and metals are recommended due to their relevance in various nuclear applications, including power reactors and radiation interactions. While polymers are often overlooked, they should not be discounted as emerging technologies may reveal new applications. The discussion highlights the importance of computational materials science and engineering, particularly in the context of multiphysics problems involving radiation. Understanding the complexities of materials in nuclear environments is crucial for future developments. Overall, the choice between ceramics and metals may depend on specific interests within nuclear applications.
Cumberland
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
For an NE major, would a ceramics or metals emphasis be a better choice for a materials science minor? I don't start upper level NE courses until next semester, but I've already taken the prerequisite MSE intro course and want to enroll in an upper level MSE course also.

I'm assuming polymers are out of the question.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
One would probably want to do ceramics and metals, since there are applications for ceramics and metal alloys in a variety of nuclear applications. Nuclear power reactors are just one of many applications. There are many applications for neutrons and gamma radiation.

I wouldn't discount polymers. We often see emerging technologies when we learn something new or better understand the science/physics.

One important area of development these days is computational materials science/engineering in conjunction with computational multiphysics. A radiation field just adds one more layer of complexity to what would otherwise be a conventional (non-nuclear) multiphysics problem.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...

Similar threads

Back
Top