Is NE degree with low gpa worth anything?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the value of a nuclear engineering degree with a low GPA, particularly in the context of career prospects and educational choices. Participants explore the implications of academic performance on job opportunities and consider alternative paths for the original poster, who is facing challenges in their current program at UC Berkeley.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster expresses concern about their academic performance at UC Berkeley, noting a significant drop from a 4.0 GPA at community college to potentially below a 3.0 GPA, which they fear may limit their graduate school and job prospects.
  • Some participants suggest that gaining practical experience through internships or research positions could enhance employability, even with a lower GPA.
  • One participant mentions that many employers prefer candidates with at least a 2.8 cumulative GPA or a 3.0 technical GPA for positions in nuclear plants, but acknowledges that it is possible to find work with a lower GPA if one has diverse work experience.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of practical skills and a strong work ethic over GPA, suggesting that humility and hard work can be more beneficial in the long run.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of work in nuclear plants, highlighting the technical skills required and the age of the equipment, which may not align with the latest engineering practices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best course of action for the original poster. There are competing views on the importance of GPA versus practical experience, and differing opinions on the feasibility of continuing at UC Berkeley versus transferring to another institution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note various assumptions regarding GPA thresholds for employment and the value of practical experience, but these are not universally agreed upon. The discussion reflects a range of perspectives on the relationship between academic performance and career opportunities in the field of nuclear engineering.

ne1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am an undergrad at UC Berkeley in my junior year. It is my first semester at UC Berkeley because I came as a transfer student from a community college, majoring in nuclear engineering. I had a 4.0 gpa at the community college, so I thought I would do good at UCB and then go to graduate school, but I have failed one of my midterms, and I'm getting C's on the others. After I failed the midterm,I keep constantly thinking about my career and get distracted from studying (kinda depressed).
Part of the problem is that we didn't cover most modern physics at the community college, and also the classes were easy, so I don't think i was prepared enough at the community college.
Now, if I continue and work hard, most likely I will graduate with a gpa below 3.0 (no graduate school and no job probably). Also, I keep hearing the idea that only the best students in NE get hired.

The only reason I came to UCB is because it has NE and I can't afford out of state tuition. One option for me is to withdraw from UCB before I get the C's this semester and transfer next year to any state school (no NE though maybe ME or CHemE) where I'm sure I would do better in school.My friends from the community college are having easier transition to other state schools(san jose,sfo, sac,long beach...). I know I should only be concerned about learning what I like (NE), but the system works by gpa and berkeley's engineering is rough (hard and many restrictions so I'm not allowed to take a light course load because I must graduate in a specific time). Should I just contunue at berkeley even though most likeley I will end up with low gpa? or should I go to any other state school and do a 2nd option major?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What I would suggest you do is to get some type of internship or coop. Although they usually only take students with decent grades, you may get away with putting down your CC gpa by itself. If you can't get either of those, I would seek out professors who are looking for undergraduate help with their research projects. This will at least get you some type of experience.

The norm is that if you do not have a stellar gpa, then you must have a good level of experience under your belt in order to get a decent job. Even with a good GPA it is harder to find a good job without experience.
 
Last edited:
I can tell you that if you want to work at a plant, it is difficult to get in if you don't have at least a 2.8 cumulative or 3.0 technical. It's not impossible (I did it, but a long and diverse work history helped, and was also a part of the reason for my low gpa). Preferred is 3.0 cumulative and 3.2 technical.
 
If you are interested in a power plant career, be advised that a nuke plant is a single reactor surrounded by thousands of pieces of electrical and mechanical equipment, and increasingly , computers... much of it older than you because we haven't built a plant since the 80's. Utilities have a difficult time finding people with technical skill and interest to dedicate themselves to such "stone age equipment".

The reactor pretty much runs fine having been designed by geniuses shortly after WW2.
The rest of the equipment is fraught with the troubles endemic to the 60's and 70's when it was designed. The saturated steam turbines are out of the '30's, just bigger... Fascinating equipment ! So beautifully Basic!

If you're the type guy who changes his own oil and sparkplugs, look the recruiter in the eye and tell him so. (I found that was the single best question i could ask potential new hires).

A smattering of 3 phase power, electronic circuits, statics dynamics and strength of materials will help you an awful lot in a plant career.

Most plants employ just a few Nuclear engineers but scores of mechanical and electricals. Mine alternated levels of management between BSc's and "School of hard knocks" all the way to the top. A mix of practical and theory is as good for the organization as it is for the individual.


Humility and hard work will get you farther than a high GPA. You're just starting from a little behind.

Remember Elbert Hubbard's admonition - "The trouble with resting on your laurels is people lose sight of them"...

good luck to you. sir...
old jim
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K