Which of the foods is more possible to cause allergy

  • Thread starter Thread starter zade70
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Allergy Cause
AI Thread Summary
Almonds and strawberries are discussed as potential allergens, with a particular emphasis on the surprising nature of strawberry allergies. The conversation highlights that strawberries, along with eggs and milk, are commonly mentioned in allergy discussions. There is a strong emotional reaction to the idea of being allergic to strawberries, indicating a perception of their desirability. The discussion reflects a general concern about food allergies and their impact on enjoyment of certain foods. Overall, strawberries and almonds are identified as significant allergens in the conversation.
zade70
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Which of the following foods is more possible to cause allergy
apples
stawberries
cereals
almonds

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm between almonds and strawberries
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ACK ! Someone is allergic to strawberries? What a horrible thought.
 
phinds said:
ACK ! Someone is allergic to strawberries? What a horrible thought.
In my book it mentions strawberries, eggs and milk to explain allergy
 
zade70 said:
In my book it mentions strawberries, eggs and milk
Well, eggs and milk I could live with but strawberries? Terrible.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top